Table 4.
Regression analysis models of executive functions on ToM performance in all MS sample.
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictors | B | SE(B) | β | B | SE(B) | β | |
(1) SS | SDMT | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.20 |
PASAT3 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.21 | |
Phenotype dummy | 0.05 | 0.43 | 0.02 | ||||
R2 | 0.14 | 0.14 | |||||
F for change in R2 | 3.24∧ | 2.11 | |||||
P | 0.05 | - | |||||
N | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | |
(2) FP | SDMT | -0.00 | 0.08 | -0.00 | -0.01 | 0.08 | -0.02 |
PASAT3 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.42 | |
Phenotype dummy | -2.55 | 1.76 | -0.21 | ||||
R2 | 0.19 | 0.23 | |||||
F for change in R2 | 4.61 | 3.87 | |||||
P | 0.016 | 0.017 | |||||
N | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 |
FP, faux pas; SS, strange stories; ∧tendency to significance. Statistically significant results are reported in bold.