Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 13;9:1952. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37769-z

Table 5.

Performance comparison between different models. P-values are calculated using a paired t-test between the proposed and each competing method.

Model accuracy (p-value) sensitivity (p-value) specificity (p-value)
(a) 6 month prediction.
Proposed 0.81 0.84 0.80
Baseline 0.76 (1.16e-08) 0.81 (0.07) 0.75 (1.87e-10)
Single modal (cognitive performance) 0.74 (3.17e-09) 0.81 (8.12e-05) 0.70 (2.68e-14)
Single modal (CSF) 0.72 (4.65e-17) 0.78 (8.12e-05) 0.70 (2.68e-14)
Single modal (MRI) 0.70 (4.68e-24) 0.75 (6.71e-10) 0.68 (2.05e-21)
(b) 12 month prediction
Proposed 0.81 0.84 0.80
Baseline 0.76 (1.77e-07) 0.82 (0.057) 0.75 (3.65e-07)
Single modal (cognitive performance) 0.75 (2.70e-08) 0.78 (0.007) 0.71 (1.73e-09)
Single modal (CSF) 0.73 (3.47e-20) 0.78 (1.40e-05) 0.72 (3.90e-16)
Single modal (MRI) 0.70 (7.29e-22) 0.73 (1.03e-12) 0.69 (2.07e-16)
(c) 18 month prediction
Proposed 0.79 0.82 0.79
Baseline 0.78 (0.08) 0.81 (0.64) 0.77 (0.15)
Single modal (cognitive performance) 0.74 (2.43e-06) 0.76 (0.03) 0.71 (7.72e-08)
Single modal (CSF) 0.72 (9.84e-12) 0.78 (0.07) 0.71 (6.55e-11)
Single modal (MRI) 0.72 (5.26e-14) 0.76 (0.16e-04) 0.71 (2.20e-10)
(d) 24 month prediction
Proposed 0.80 0.81 0.80
Baseline 0.76 (2.12e-05) 0.80 (0.57) 0.76 (8.95e-05)
Single modal (cognitive performance) 0.74 (4.69e-07) 0.76 (0.15) 0.72 (1.20e-09)
Single modal (CSF) 0.73 (1.06e-09) 0.73 (0.001) 0.74 (3.16e-07)
Single modal (MRI) 0.71 (1.18e-12) 0.76 (0.03) 0.70 (2.53e-10)