Table 3.
Diet | OTU | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson | Good’s coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control A | 205.67 ± 48.42 | 230.53 ± 58.50 | 1.01 ± 0.15∗= 1 | 0.69 ± 0.07∗= 1 | 99.7 ± 0.1 |
Ulva A | 201.50 ± 47.48 | 229.40 ± 41.30 | 1.60 ± 0.54∗ | 0.48 ± 0.19∗ | 99.7 ± 0.1 |
Control P | 213.33 ± 53.63 | 227.42 ± 62.71 | 1.72 ± 0.40= 1 | 0.39 ± 0.14= 1 | 99.7 ± 0.2 |
Ulva P | 271.33 ± 88.41 | 280.67 ± 81.98 | 2.23 ± 0.62 | 0.30 ± 0.14 | 99.8 ± 0.1 |
Values are average ± SD. ∗Significant differences between the experimental diets for the same gastrointestinal region; = 1significant differences between GI sections in fish fed the same diet, p < 0.05.