Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 15;9(3):1255–1267. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4831

Table 2.

Analyses of variance of the effects of open‐versus self‐pollination, stress type, and stress level (control, intermediate, or high) on fitness‐related traits (TLA, log‐total leaf area; NL, number of leaves), on allocation (LMF, leaf mass fraction; SMF, stem mass fraction; RMF, root mass fraction) and other functional plant traits (LDMC, leaf dry matter content; SLA, log‐specific leaf area; Pet, log‐petiole length; Chl, leaf chlorophyll content) of Anthyllis vulneraria

Source df Fitness traits Functional plant traits
TLA NL LMF SMF RMF LDMC SLA Pet Chl
F F F F F F F F F
Stress type 4 17.97 *** 17.29 *** 91.65 *** 42.31 *** 91.21 *** 65.88 *** 151.67 *** 14.27 *** 72.35 ***
Stress level 2 238.78 *** 193.20 *** 15.35 *** 34.33 *** 2.55 39.71 *** 7.28 *** 67.48 *** 44.23 ***
Stress type × level 8 7.88 *** 8.38 *** 28.93 *** 18.97 *** 30.41 *** 24.38 *** 57.54 *** 6.64 *** 24.68 ***
Open versus Self‐Pollination 1 11.31 *** 6.22 * 0.32 7.68 ** 2.28 0.55 0.38 1.71 11.31 ***
Pollination × Stress type 4 0.39 0.81 0.49 0.52 0.33 0.26 0.09 0.37 0.63
Pollination × Stress level 2 0.01 1.07 0.04 0.27 0.13 0.05 0.71 0.02 0.20
Pollination × Stress type × level 8 0.62 0.38 0.43 1.75 1.02 1.18 1.14 1.33 0.74
Residual 263

* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.