Performance measure	We recommend information on comfort is reviewed and fed back to endoscopists and staff and, where appropriate, action is taken to improve patient comfort levels
Domain	Comfort, privacy, and dignity
Category	Process
Rationale	As for Performance measure 7.1, plus action needs to be taken to protect patients from unnecessary pain
Standards	Minimum standard: information on patient comfort levels is collated, reviewed, and fed back to individual endoscopists and staff at least twice a year Target standard: when review of patient comfort identifies areas for improvement, action is taken to improve patient comfort within a reasonable time period (6–12 months)
Consensus agreement	96.3%
PICO	Not applicable
Concordance with other guidelines	ASGE Yes	Canada Yes	EU Yes	GRS/JAG accreditation Yes
Evidence grading	Low/very low