Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;7(1):60–68. doi: 10.1177/2050640618808147

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

First author, yearref Design Setting Country Type of procedures Age, mean (SD) Male, n (%) Sample size Clinical success Technical success Adverse events
Nakai, 201623 Retrospective Multicenter Japan HGS 70 (63–77), (median, IQR) 19 (58) 33 33 33 3
Kunda, 201620 Retrospective Multicenter Europe CDS 73 (49–93), median (range) 31 (54) 57 54 56 4
Park, 201527 RCT Multicenter Korea HGS NR NR 20 18 20 5
Poincloux, 201528 Retrospective Single center France HGS NR NR 66 61 65 16
CDS 67 (10.3) 18 (60) 30 27 29 6
Umeda, 201531 Prospective Single center Japan HGS 77 (NR) 15 (65) 23 23 23 4
Artifon, 201515 RCT Single center Brazil HGS 66.25 (14.28) 11 (44) 25 22 24 5
CDS 65.77 (15.74) 11 (46) 24 17 22 3
Song, 201429 Prospective Single center Korea CDS 67 (48–82), median (range) 8 (47) 17 16 17 2
Paik, 201424 Prospective Single center Korea HGS NR NR 28 24 27 2
Park, 201126 Prospective Single center Korea HGS NR NR 31 27 31 6
CDS NR NR 26 22 24 5
Hara, 201117 Prospective Single center Japan CDS 67.9 (10.9) 7 18 17 17 4
Cho, 201716 Prospective Single center Korea CDS 64 (29–86), median (range) 13 33 33 33 10
HGS 66.3 (44–82), median (range) 16 21 18 21 14
Minaga, 201721 Retrospective Single center Japan HGS 66 (NR) 11 30 22 29 10
Paik, 201725 Retrospective Multicenter Korea and Japan HGS 67.6 (9.3) 13 16 13 16 7
Sportes, 201730 Retrospective Single center France HGS 69.2 (NR) 17 31 25 31 5
Khashab, 201619 Retrospective Single center United States HGS 63.6 (13.8) 38 61 50 56 28
CDS 67.6 (13) 32 60 51 56 16
Hara, 201318 Prospective Single center Japan CDS 67.27 12 18 16 17 2
Moryoussef, 201722 Prospective Single center France HGS 68.8 (16.4) 11 18 13 17 3

CDS: choledochoduodenostomy; HGS: hepaticogastrostomy; IQR: interquartile range; NR: not reported; RCT: randomized controlled trial; SD: standard deviation.