Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 14;19:27. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1254-1

Table 4.

C1 vs. C2, Five Split-Half Replications

Replication 1
 Training Set (n = 217)  Test Set (n = 213)
  C1: 84/89 correct, 94.38%   C1: 72/80 correct, 90.00%
  C2: 121/128 correct, 94.53%   C2: 124/133 correct, 93.23%
Replication 2
 Training Set (n = 203)  Test Set (n = 227)
  C1: 80/84 correct, 95.24%   C1: 75/85 correct, 88.24%
  C2: 110/119 correct, 92.44%   C2: 130/142 correct, 91.55%
Replication 3
 Training Set (n = 228)  Test Set (n = 202)
  C1: 78/85 correct, 91.76%   C1: 68/84 correct, 80.95%
  C2: 133/143 correct, 93.01%   C2: 111/118 correct, 93.07%
Replication 4
 Training Set (n = 212)  Test Set (n = 218)
  C1: 83/86 correct, 96.51%   C1: 71/83 correct, 85.54%
  C2: 120/126 correct, 95.24%   C2: 117/135 correct, 86.67%
Replication 5
 Training Set (n = 218)  Test Set (n = 212)
  C1: 77/84 correct, 91.67%   C1: 74/85 correct, 87.06%
  C2: 129/134 correct, 96.27%   C2: 120/127 correct, 94.49%
 Average Correct Test Set
  C1 = 86.36%
  C2 = 91.80%