Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 7;126(9):097001. doi: 10.1289/EHP1655

Figure 6.

Figure 6 plots log sub 10 EAD (y-axis) across chemicals (x-axis) for PPK, PPK underscore E F, and ppk underscore f sub u.

Estrogenic Dose Predictions for 266 Chemicals. EAD values (log10 scale) were predicted from ACCER for all 266 potential ER agonists from the ToxCast™ ER pathway model, using the PPK model (∗ symbol) and PPK model with EF (triangle) or fu (circle) adjustments. PPK, one-compartment population-based PK pharmacokinetic model; PPK_EF, PPK model with EF adjustment applied for ACCER in EAD calculation. PPK_fu, PPK model with fu adjustment applied for in vivo Css in EAD calculation. Data for this figure are provided in Excel Table S3. ACCER, pseudo median activity concentration at cutoff from estrogen receptor pathway model; CLint, intrinsic clearance (L/h); Css, steady-state plasma concentration; EAD, equivalent administered dose; EF, enrichment factor; ER, estrogen receptor; fu, fraction of chemical unbound to plasma protein.