Table 1. Comparison of the 6 libraries used in this study.
| Mutants libraries statistical comparison | High | Medium | Low | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4E YW | VPg S41g | 4E YW | VPg S41g | 4E YW | VPg S41g | ||
|
High |
4E YW | x | n.s | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| VPg S41g | x | *** | *** | *** | *** | ||
|
Medium |
4E YW | x | n.s | * | * | ||
| VPg S41g | x | ** | ** | ||||
|
Low |
4E YW | x | n.s | ||||
| VPg S41g | x | ||||||
Side by side comparisons of average non-synonymous mutation number per variant in eIF4E and VPg mutant libraries. "***": p-value< 0.0001
"**": p-value< 0.001
"*": p-value< 0.01; “n.s”,not significant. For p-value> 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test, libraries were considered as non-significantly different.