Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 14;16(2):e1002748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002748

Table 6. Clinical detection of depression and of AUD among adult government health clinic attendees, Chitwan, Nepal, 2013–2017.

Disorder Baseline (BL)
(N = 1,252)
Midline (ML)
(N = 1,396)
Endline (EL) (N = 979) ML minus BL (95% CI)
or ML (95% CI)
Cohen’s h for ML minus BL EL minus BL (95% CI)
or EL (95% CI)
Cohen’s h for EL minus BL
Depression
Screen positive (%) 186/1,252 (14.9) 143/1,396 (10.2) 99/979 (10.1)
Screen positive with consultation data (%) 179/186 (96.2) 134/143 (93.7) 94/99 (95.0)
Detected (%) 16/179 (8.9) 33/134 (24.6) 18/94 (19.2) +15.7* (7.3, 24.0) 0.432 +10.2* (1.2, 19.2) 0.301
Adequate treatment 0/16 (0.0) 31/33 (93.9) 12/18 (66.7) 93.9** (77.9, 98.6) 66.7** (41.7, 84.8)
AUD—men only
Screen positive (%) 92/1,252 (7.4) 180/1,396 (12.9) 38/979 (3.9)
Screen positive with consultation data (%) 90/92 (97.8) 170/180 (94.4) 33/38 (86.8)
Detected (%) 1/90 (1.1) 102/170 (60.0) 4/33 (12.1) +58.9* (42.0, 75.7) 1.562 +11.0* (0.7, 21.3) 0.500
Adequate treatment 0/1 (0.0) 97/102 (95.1) 3/4 (75.0) 95.1** (88.6, 98.0) 75.0** (17.6, 97.7)

Detection proportion differences and p-values estimated using binomial regression accounting for clinic-level clustering, and standard errors adjusted for clinic-level clustering.

*p < 0.05 for difference of coverage from baseline round using binomial regression.

**p < 0.05 for association of coverage with baseline round, using Fisher’s exact test.

AUD, alcohol use disorder.