Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 18;68(5):757–772. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy562

Table 3.

Univariable and Multivariable Meta-regression Analyses of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Seroprevalence Among Different Populations in Asia

Variable Outcome Measures,
Total No.
Samples,
Total No.
Univariable Analysis Multivariable Analysis
RR
(95% CI)
P Value Variance Explained, Adjusted R2, % Model 1a Model 2b
ARR
(95%CI)
P Value ARR
(95% CI)
P Value
Age bracket
 Children 26 1851 1.0 1.0
 Adults 151 20705 1.5 (1.3–1.7) <.001 1.5 (1.3–1.7) <.001
 Mixed ages 5 3758 1.4 (1.1–1.9) .01 18.6 1.5 (1.1–2.0) .006
Age group
 <20 y 37 3101 1.0 1.0
 20–39 y 48 5601 1.2 (1.0–1.4) .008 1.3 (1.0–1.5) <.001
 ≥40 y 44 4966 1.5 (1.3–1.8) <.001 1.6 (1.4–1.9) <.001
 Mixed 53 12646 1.3 (1.1–1.5) <.001 21.1 1.3 (1.1–1.5) <.001
Assay type
 Western blot 9 2859 1.0 1.0 1.0
 ELISA 137 20032 0.8 (.6–1.0) .09 0.9 (.8–1.1) .63 0.9 (.7–1.0) .28
 Others 36 3423 0.8 (.6–1.0) .13 0.5 1.0 (.8–1.2) .98 1.0 (.8–1.2) .72
Country’s income
 LMIC 58 8047 1.0 1.0 1.0
 UMIC 55 10084 1.2 (1.0–1.3) .02 1.1 (1.0–1.3) .01 1.1 (1.0–1.3) .03
 HIC 69 8183 0.9 (.8–1.1) .39 7.1 0.9 (.8–1.2) .13 0.9 (.8–.9) .01
Population type
 Healthy general populations 126 12086 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Clinical populations 31 5638 0.9 (.8–1.0) .17 1.0 (.8–1.1) .74 1.0 (.9–1.1) .87
 Other populations 25 8590 1.1 (1.0–1.3) .07 0.2 1.1 (.9–1.2) .53 1.0 (.9–1.2) .52
Sample sizec
 <100 22 905 1.0
 ≥100 160 25409 0.9 (.8–1.1) .65 0.0
Sampling method
 Probability based 33 7104 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Non–probability based 149 19210 0.9 (.8–1.0) .04 1.4 1.0 (.9–1.2) .67 1.0 (.8–1.1) .93
Sex
 Female 56 5665 1.0
 Male 55 6422 0.9 (.8–1.1) .29
 Mixed 71 14227 0.9 (.8–1.1) .46 1.4
Year of data collection 182 26314 1.0 (1.0–1.0) .84 0.0
Year of publication 182 26314 1.0 (1.0–1.0) .58 0.0

Abbreviations: ARR, adjusted risk ratio; CI, confidence interval; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HIC, high-income country; LMIC, lower-middle-income country; RR, risk ratio; UMIC, upper-middle-income country.

aThe variance explained by the final multivariable model 1 (adjusted R2) was 26.0%

bThe variance explained by the final multivariable model 2 (adjusted R2) was 33.9%

cSample size denotes the sample size for each study population found in the original publication.