Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 21;111(2):170–179. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy098

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of 1023 stage III colon cancer patients by quintiles of dietary insulin load and dietary insulin index

Characteristics Dietary insulin load (quintiles)
Dietary insulin index (quintiles)
1 2 3 4 5 P* 1 2 3 4 5 P*
(n = 204) (n = 205) (n = 205) (n = 205) (n = 204) (n = 204) (n = 205) (n = 205) (n = 205) (n = 204)
Dietary insulin score, median (range) 721.1 791.5 831.8 868.0 934.6 38.0 41.5 43.5 45.5 48.5
(459.7–766.5) (767.3–813.2) (813.3–847.8) (847.8–890.9) (891.2–1162.1) (24.6–40.1) (40.1–42.6) (42.6–44.4) (44.4–46.7) (46.7–59.4)
Male, No. (%) 136 (67) 119 (58) 107 (52) 103 (50) 111 (54) .008 136 (67) 120 (59) 109 (53) 101 (49) 110 (54) .005
Age, median (range), y 60 (28–80) 58 (21–82) 61 (34–82) 60 (24–85) 63 (28–85) .90 60 (28–80) 58 (21–82) 60 (26–80) 60 (24–85) 63 (28–85) .40
Race, No. (%)
 White 187 (92) 180 (88) 182 (89) 184 (90) 178 (87) .23 186 (91) 181 (88) 183 (89) 179 (87) 182 (90) .81
 Black 6 (3) 16 (8) 12 (6) 17 (8) 14 (7) 8 (4) 14 (7) 12 (6) 18 (9) 13 (6)
 Other 11 (5) 9 (4) 11 (5) 4 (2) 12 (6) 10 (5) 10 (5) 10 (5) 8 (4) 9 (4)
Baseline performance status, No. (%)
 0 161 (79) 140 (68) 153 (75) 145 (71) 150 (74) .12 158 (77) 147 (72) 148 (72) 145 (71) 151 (74) .41
 1–2 38 (19) 61 (30) 49 (24) 55 (27) 50 (24) 41 (20) 56 (27) 51 (25) 57 (28) 48 (23)
 Unknown 5 (2) 4 (2) 3 (1) 5 (2) 4 (2) 5 (3) 2 (1) 6 (3) 3 (1) 5 (3)
Invasion through bowel wall by T stage, No. (%)§
 T1–2 28 (14) 24 (12) 31 (15) 30 (15) 25 (12) .81 29 (14) 23 (11) 29 (14) 29 (14) 28 (14) .88
 T3–4 172 (84) 176 (86) 169 (82) 169 (82) 175 (86) 171 (84) 178 (87) 169 (83) 172 (84) 171 (84)
 Unknown 4 (2) 5 (2) 5 (3) 6 (3) 4 (2) 4 (2) 4 (2) 7 (3) 4 (2) 5 (2)
Positive lymph nodes, No. (%)
 1–3 136 (67) 138 (67) 134 (66) 121 (59) 113 (55) .06 133 (65) 135 (66) 133 (65) 123 (60) 118 (58) .38
 ≥4 64 (31) 64 (31) 68 (33) 79 (39) 86 (42) 67 (33) 69 (33) 66 (32) 79 (39) 80 (39)
 Unknown 4 (2) 3 (2) 3 (1) 5 (2) 5 (3) 4 (2) 1 (1) 6 (3) 3 (1) 6 (3)
Grade of differentiation, No. (%)
 Well 7 (3) 17 (8) 7 (3) 13 (6) 13 (6) .15 6 (3) 16 (8) 11 (6) 12 (6) 12 (6) .45
 Moderate 147 (72) 127 (62) 151 (74) 143 (70) 137 (67) 146 (72) 132 (64) 140 (68) 148 (72) 139 (68)
 Poor/undifferentiated 45 (22) 58 (28) 44 (21) 43 (21) 49 (24) 47 (23) 56 (27) 47 (23) 41 (20) 48 (24)
 Unknown 5 (3) 3 (2) 3 (2) 6 (3) 5 (3) 5 (2) 1 (1) 7 (3) 4 (2) 5 (2)
Treatment arm, No. (%)
 5-FU/LV 100 (49) 99 (48) 108 (53) 105 (51) 105 (52) .90 100 (49) 100 (49) 109 (53) 103 (50) 105 (52) .90
 IFL 104 (51) 106 (52) 97 (47) 100 (49) 99 (48) 104 (51) 105 (51) 96 (47) 102 (50) 99 (48)
BMI, No. (%), kg/m2
 BMI <25 51 (25) 60 (29) 48 (23) 69 (34) 75 (37) .04 48 (23) 61 (30) 52 (25) 67 (33) 75 (37) .07
 25 ≤ BMI < 30 89 (44) 71 (35) 80 (39) 70 (34) 63 (31) 89 (44) 73 (35) 75 (37) 74 (36) 62 (30)
 BMI ≥30 64 (31) 74 (36) 77 (38) 66 (32) 66 (32) 67 (33) 71 (35) 78 (38) 64 (31) 67 (33)
Physical activity, median (range), MET h/wk 8.6 8.4 5.5 5.7 5.9 .03 8.2 7.0 7.0 5.6 5.7 .12
(0.0–103.9) (0.0–119.0) (0.0–102.2) (0.0–122.9) (0.0–75.2) (0.0–119.0) (0.0–103.1) (0.0–122.9) (0.0–93.4) (0.0–97.7)
Cereal fiber, median (range), g 4.6 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.4 <.001 4.6 5.3 5.4 5.9 6.3 <.001
(0.9–22.8) (0.8–19.5) (1.8–20.6) (1.4–21.7) (0.4–24.9) (0.9–22.8) (0.8–11.6) (1.7–21.7) (1.8–15.6) (0.4–24.9)
Glycemic load, median (range) 116 133.4 143.2 149.2 165.0 <.001 116.0 134.3 142.1 149.3 163.9 <.001
(65.0–168.9) (99.5–184.5) (98.6–203.9) (103.9–189.9) (116.1–216.6) (65.0–168.9) (106.4–177.0) (98.6–193.9) (112.7–203.9) (106.8–220.6)
Total carbohydrate intake, median (range), g/d 214.0 240.5 252.5 264.8 284.0 <.001 214.0 241.0 255.3 264.3 283.8 <.001
(129.9–299.3) (172.6–312.8) (190.2–327.7) (183.6–344.4) (212.7–383.6) (129.9–299.3) (185.6–318.2) (172.6–344.4) (198.5–362.6) (201.5–383.6)
Alcohol intake, median (range), g/d 8.5 1.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 <.001 8.8 1.6 0.8 0.3 0 <.001
(0.0–93.0) (0.0–36.7) (0.0–45.0) (0.0–31.5) (0.0–16.3) (0.0–93.0) (0.0–41.4) (0.0–45.0) (0.0–19.8) (0.0–16.3)
*

Chi-square test for categorical variables; Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. All statistical tests were two-sided. 5-FU = 5-fluorouracil; BMI = body mass index; IFL = irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin; LV = leucovorin; MET = metabolic equivalent tasks.

Using cumulative averaging from questionnaire 1 and questionnaire 2.

Baseline performance status: Performance status 0 = fully active; Performance status 1 = restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out light work; Performance status 2 = ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours.

§

T1–2 = level of invasion through the bowel wall not beyond the muscle layer; T3–4 = level of invasion through the bowel wall beyond the muscle layer.