Table 1.
Summary of key model inputs for one Exemplar Local Authority (LA)
| All | Male | Female | |||||||
| 18–24 | 25–34 | 35–54 | ≥55 | 18–24 | 25–34 | 35–54 | ≥55 | ||
| A: Population age ≥ 18 | 600,830 | 49,070 | 56,789 | 97,948 | 87,621 | 51,295 | 56,882 | 98,356 | 102,869 |
| B: Estimated numbers of people who are potentially in need of assessment and specialist treatment for alcohol dependence (“PINASTFAD”) | |||||||||
| Total | 14,581 | 3,533 | 3,982 | 3,052 | 1,121 | 1,555 | 443 | 700 | 197 |
| Mild a | 7,572 | 1,591 | 1,904 | 1,664 | 738 | 805 | 284 | 444 | 142 |
| Moderateb | 5,626 | 1,540 | 1,671 | 1,152 | 314 | 607 | 117 | 200 | 25 |
| Severec | 1,145 | 372 | 377 | 206 | 39 | 113 | 12 | 26 | 0 |
| Severe & complexc | 238 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| C: Number of individuals starting a new treatment journey 2013/2014 (NDTMS) | |||||||||
| Total | 1,580 | 48 | 214 | 612 | 139 | 36 | 126 | 302 | 103 |
| 0–15 units/weeke | 550 | 17 | 76 | 144 | 39 | 16 | 50 | 135 | 73 |
| 16–30 units/weekf | 426 | 16 | 61 | 185 | 50 | 8 | 18 | 73 | 15 |
| ≥31 units/weekg | 208 | 5 | 26 | 108 | 23 | 0 | 21 | 20 | 5 |
| Complex needsh | 396 | 10 | 51 | 175 | 27 | 12 | 37 | 74 | 10 |
| D: Starting specialist treatment access rate (no. of new journeys divided by no. of people who are PINASTFAD), % | |||||||||
| Total | 10.84 | 1.36 | 5.37 | 20.05 | 12.40 | 2.32 | 28.46 | 43.16 | 52.37 |
| Mild (e / a) | 7.26 | 1.07 | 3.99 | 8.65 | 5.28 | 1.99 | 17.61 | 30.41 | 51.41 |
| Moderate & severe (f + g) / (b + c) | 9.36 | 1.10 | 4.25 | 21.58 | 20.68 | 1.11 | 30.23 | 41.15 | 80.00 |
| Moderate & severe + complex (f + g + h) / (b + c + d) | 14.70 | 1.60 | 6.64 | 33.73 | 26.13 | 2.67 | 47.89 | 65.31 | 54.85 |
| E: Completed journeys according to pathway (4 broad categories), % | |||||||||
| Community psychosocial | Community pharmacology | Residential | In-patient | Total | |||||
| Exemplar LA | 43 | 49 | 7 | 1 | 100 | ||||
| National | 77 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 100 | ||||
| Difference | -34 | 35 | 5 | -6 | – | ||||
| F: Completed journeys according to outcome, % | |||||||||
| All success | Success (abstain) | Success(non-problematic drinking) | Dropout | Transfer | Died | Total | |||
| Exemplar LA | 61 | 35 | 26 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 100 | ||
| National | 47 | 33 | 14 | 45 | 6 | 1 | 100 | ||
| Difference | 14 | 2 | 12 | -13 | 0 | 0 | – | ||
Notes: NDTMS = National Drug Treatment Monitoring System.
