Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 6;74(3):526–535. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw147

Table 3.

Comparison of R2 Values for Models Testing Four Interaction Terms for Each Domaina

Model CM domain Base R2 Interaction R2 p Value
Male Infectious disease .3379 .3392 .3637
Time 1 Chronic disease .3379 .3385 .6061
Impairment .3379 .3385 .4308
SES .3379 .3386 .3579
Parental behavior .3379 .3390 .1641
Male Infectious disease .6518 .6522 .1642
Time 2 Chronic disease .6518 .6523 .3275
Impairment .6518 .6519 .2593
SES .6518 .6521 .4846
Parental behavior .6518 .6520 .6617
Female Infectious disease .3148 .3155 .1940
Time 1 Chronic disease .3148 .3156 .2384
Impairment .3148 .3153 .6356
SES .3148 .3154 .6205
Parental behavior .3148 .3156 .0573
Female Infectious disease .6453 .6455 .7395
Time 2 Chronic disease .6453 .6457 .1701
Impairment .6453 .6456 .0204
SES .6453 .6454 .9617
Parental behavior .6453 .6456 .6461

Note: CM = childhood misfortune; SES = socioeconomic status.

aFour product terms were tested for each model (Black × CM1, Black × CM2+, Hispanic × CM1, Hispanic × CM2+). Base R2 is the corrected R2 from the fully adjusted M3. Each group of four product term interactions was entered into the adjusted model and tested for joint significance by assessing whether the set of interactions significantly increased the R2 compared with the base model R2. Due to the high number of related hypothesis tests being conducted, an adjusted significance cutoff (0.00256) was obtained using a step-down procedure to control for the family-wise error rate (Benjamini & Liu, 1999; multproc command in Stata 14 using method=liu1). None of the product term interaction groups were significant.