Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 31;13(1):e0007085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007085

Table 4. Gender interaction for learning outcomes.

numeracy literacy total
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Panel A: treatment effects by gender
treat × female 0.196*
(0.0974)
0.149*
(0.0798)
0.215**
(0.104)
0.148*
(0.0792)
0.217**
(0.0999)
0.160**
(0.0777)
treat -0.0429
(0.0871)
-0.00411
(0.0858)
-0.0678
(0.120)
-0.0209
(0.108)
-0.0562
(0.0946)
-0.0104
(0.0866)
female -0.112
(0.0813)
-0.561
(0.444)
-0.0250
(0.0948)
0.136
(0.168)
-0.0801
(0.0881)
-0.304
(0.231)
controls included? no yes no yes no yes
N 2052 2052 2053 2053 2031 2031
R2 0.00405 0.232 0.00481 0.246 0.00447 0.274
Panel B: female only
treat 0.154
(0.0995)
0.145
(0.0954)
0.147
(0.130)
0.127
(0.117)
0.160
(0.114)
0.149
(0.105)
controls included? no yes no yes no yes
N 1010 1010 1012 1012 998 998
R2 0.00752 0.236 0.00547 0.261 0.00788 0.284

In Panel A, “treat × female” represents the differential effect of treatment for female respondents compared to male respondents. The uninteracted treatment coefficient presents treatment effects for male respondents. Controls (in columns 2, 4, and 6) include gender, age, and survey round, and all interactions of these variables. Robust standard errors clustered at parish level in parentheses.

* p< .1,

** p< .05,

*** p< .01