Table 2.

Results of Three-Level Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling on Fidelity Items from Three Family Therapy Models

	Factor 1: Interactional Change	Factor 2: Relational Reframe	Factor 3: Adolescent Engagement	Factor 4: Relational Emphasis
Coaches interactions in session	.891	−.016	−.018	−.033
Moves close to direct restructuring maneuvers	.884	−.029	−.007	.006
Stimulates dialogues/Directs enactments	.823	−.061	−.015	−.038
Remains decentralized after enactment emerges	.802	−.056	−.001	−.002
Conducts in-session exercises for new behaviors	.667	.115	−.027	.012
Focuses on present interactions	.625	.071	.091	.061
Provides a family-focused rationale for change	−.093	.848	−.006	−.028
Utilizes meaning-change interventions (reframe)	.002	.735	−.064	.006
Offers more positive view of problems/family	−.046	.645	.068	.053
Provides information/guidance for new skill	.196	.529	.022	−.066
Maintains a relational focus	.025	.528	.072	.170
Targets adult participants for change	.011	.492	−.131	−.036
Develops relational reframe for youth problems	−.105	.432	.040	−.094
Joins with children/adolescents	.005	−.014	.882	.043
Targets interventions toward youth	.084	.062	.748	−.049
Supports adolescent investment in therapy	−.044	−.016	.464	−.022
Explores adolescent ecosystem	−.133	−.060	.406	−.013
Gathers information on relationship functions	−.079	−.013	−.083	.809
Asks clarifying questions/Focuses on process	−.059	−.007	.015	.643
Enhances family attachment/communication	.080	.044	−.018	.467
Connects with all family members	.092	.011	.120	.465

Note. Items in bold are hypothesized to load on the corresponding factor. Italicized items fall outside the 95% credibility interval.