Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;58(1):81–87. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1521985

Table 2.

Dosimetric comparability of modified contours versus auto-segmented contours

Structures and Dosimetric Variables Modified Contours, Mean ± SD Auto-Segmented Contours, Mean ± SD Correlation Coefficients* P-Values
Heart 0.984
 Dmean, Gy 10.81 ± 7.78 10.85 ± 7.84 0.86
 V30, % 13 ± 11 14 ± 11 0.983 0.89
Left atrium 0.991
 Dmean, Gy 20.71 ± 16.21 20.81 ± 16.07 0.66
Left ventricle 0.994
 Dmean, Gy 4.02 ± 7.11 4.02 ± 7.12 0.33
Right atrium 0.951
 Dmean, Gy 9.97 ± 10.14 10.83 ± 10.58 0.11
Right ventricle 0.973
 Dmean, Gy 5.03 ± 6.15 5.02 ± 6.08 0.24
Superior vena cava 0.936
 Dmax, Gy 74.04 ± 17.06 74.19 ± 17.04 0.14
Inferior vena cava 0.856
 Dmax, Gy 6.97 ± 15.84 7.91 ± 16.74 0.20
Pulmonary artery 0.930
 Dmax, Gy 80.75 ± 7.60 80.39 ± 7.47 0.08
Pulmonary vein 0.791
 Dmax, Gy 78.11 ± 13.24 76.44 ± 14.23 0.01
Descending aorta 0.956
 Dmax, Gy 63.41 ± 21.38 62.41 ± 21.68 0.18
Ascending aorta 0.992
 Dmax, Gy 10.81 ± 7.78 10.85 ± 7.84 0.86

Abbreviations: V30, percentage volume receiveing dose ≥ 30 Gy; SD, standard deviation

*

From Pearson’s correlation coefficient (normally distributed data) or Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (non-normally distributed data).

From paired Student’s t-tests (normally distributed data) or Wilcoxon signed-rank test (non-normally distributed data).