Table 1.
Study subject | With raltegravir day 14 | Without raltegravir day 14 | Amplification day 14 without raltegravir | Amplification AUC without raltegravir | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUPM | 95% CI | IUPM | 95% CI | IUPM | 95% CI | IUPM | 95% CI | |
197 | 0.7 | 0.3–1.8 | 7.8 | 3.8–15.9 | 5.7 | 2.9–11.2 | 4.8 | 2.4–9.6 |
215 | 9.9 | 5.0–19.5 | 18.3 | 9.5–35.2 | 6.5 | 3.5–12.2 | 1.5 | 0.8–2.8 |
216 | 0.1 | 0.3–0.3 | 1.1 | 0.5–2.2 | 1.2 | 0.6–2.5 | 1.2 | 0.6–2.5 |
217 | 1.1 | 0.5–2.2 | 0.5 | 0.2–1.4 | 0.5 | 0.2–1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4–1.9 |
219 | 15.7 | 8.1–30.5 | 18.7 | 9.2–38.2 | 7.1 | 3.5–14.2 | 14.4 | 7.6–27.5 |
IUPM were calculated as described in Methods. Column 1: Subject number. Column 2: IUPM with a positive well defined as containing > 100 copies HIV RNA per ml on day 14 in the presence of raltegravir. Column 3: IUPM with a positive well defined as containing > 100 copies HIV RNA per ml on day 14 in the absence of raltegravir. Two criteria were used to define amplification (replication competence) in the absence of raltegravir: Column 4: A well was defined as positive on day 14 without raltegravir when the value was greater than the mean plus 5 SD of the 6 wells in the presence of raltegravir. Column 5: The criterion for a positive well assessing amplification by AUC without raltegravir used the mean and SD of the area under the curve for the 2 weeks of measurements for all six wells in that dilution in the presence of raltegravir