Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Econ. 2019 Jan 15;28(3):419–436. doi: 10.1002/hec.3854

Table 4 —

The Intertemporal Relationship Between E-cigarette MLSA Law and Youth Smoking

National and State YRBSS: 2005–2015

DV: Youth is a current smoker 1 2 3 4 5 6
Exposed to E-cigarette MLSA Law While Underage 0.002 0.005 0.010 0.001 0.006 0.009
(0.013) (0.015) (0.014) (0.014) (0.016) (0.015)
Full Controls
State FEs
Year FEs
State-specific linear pre-trends
State-specific linear trends
Mean of dep. var. in the control states 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24
Observations 93,716 93,716 93,716 93,716 93,716 93,716

Notes: Standard errors, clustered at the state level, are shown in parentheses.

All models include dummy variables for gender, race, age, and grade levels. State-level covariates listed in Table 1 are included.

The analysis sample is restricted to youth aged 18 or above.

In columns 1–3, we include Alabama, Alaska, New Jersey, and Utah, where the age limits of purchasing e-cigarettes are set at 19.

In columns 4–6, we exclude Alabama, Alaska, New Jersey, and Utah.

The definition of the key regressor, “Exposed to E-cigarette MLSA Law While Underage,” is in the text.