Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2018 Oct 15;75(3):378–382. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.009

Table 1 –

Baseline demographic and disease characteristics of our 13 MMR-deficient prostate cancers

Characteristic MMR-deficient men (N = 13) MMR-proficient men (N = 114)
Age at diagnosis (yr)
    Median (Q1–Q3) 64 (61–70) 63 (59–69)
Race, N (%)
    White 9 (69) 99 (87)
Presence of any secondary malignancy, N (%) 3 (23) 9 (8)
Family history of cancer, N (%)
    First-degree relative 8 (62) 59 (52)
    Non–first-degree relative 5 (38) 18 (16)
Gleason sum at diagnosis, N (%)
    ≤7 2 (15) 30 (26)
    ≥8 10 (77) 77 (67)
    Unknown 1 (8) 7 (6)
Presence of perineural invasion, N (%) 4 (31) 68 (60)
Presence of variant histology, N (%)
    Ductal/intraductal 3 (23) 14 (12)
    Neuroendocrine 1 (8) 0 (0)
Tumor stage at diagnosis, N (%)
    T1/T2 3 (23) 36 (32)
    T3/T4 10 (77) 78 (68)
Lymph node stage at diagnosis, N (%)
    N1 5 (38) 15 (13)
Metastatic stage at diagnosis, N (%)
    M1 6 (46) 37 (32)
Presence of bone metastasis, N (%)
    Bone only 3 (23) 34 (30)
    With visceral metastasis (lung, liver) 4 (31) 22 (19)
Presence of lung metastasis only, N (%) 2 (15) 4 (3)
Presence of liver metastasis, N (%) 2 (15) 10 (9)
Use of standard ADT, N (%) 13 (100) 114 (100)
Use of abiraterone, N (%) 3 (23) 47 (41)
Use of enzalutamide, N (%) 5 (38) 28 (25)
Use of docetaxel, N (%) 2 (15) 38 (33)
Use of PD-1 inhibitor, N (%) 4 (31) 2 (2)
PSA at diagnosis (ng/ml)
    Median (Q1–Q3) 10 (5.4–43) 13 (5.5–32)

ADT = androgen deprivation therapy; MMR = mismatch repair; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.

For comparison, we also include baseline characteristics for a group of 114 MMR-proficient men from our somatic sequencing database with full clinical and outcome data.