Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2018 May 30;70:10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.05.027

Table 3.

Relation of watershed microinfarcts with cognitive domains

Brain
Regions		 Microinfarct
Measure		 Episodic
Memory		 Semantic
Memory		 Working
Memory		 Visuospatial
Ability		 Perceptual
Speed
Cortical Watershed Single −0.11
(0.21, 0.60)		 −0.22
(0.23, 0.44)		 −0.06
(0.20, 0.78)		 −0.15
(0.20, 0.46)		 −0.24
(0.18, 0.20)
Multiple −0.35
(0.29, 0.22)		 −0.50
(0.31, 0.10)		 −0.58
(0.27, 0.03*) 		−0.57
(0.27, 0.03*) 		−0.08
(0.24, 0.75)
Other Brain Regions Single 0.15
(0.15, 0.32)		 0.06
(0.17, 0.72)		 0.24
(0.14, 0.10)		 0.15
(0.14, 0.29)		 0.08
(0.13, 0.52)
Multiple −0.19
(0.21, 0.37)		 −0.17
(0.23, 0.46)		 −0.24
(0.20, 0.22)		 0.13
(0.20, 0.50)		 −0.15
(0.18, 0.41)

Linear regression models with terms for age, sex, education, AD pathology summary score, and macroscopic infarcts. All models used trichotomous variables for microinfarct measures (none, single, and multiple). Values in cells are estimated coefficients (SE, p-value). Significant (p<0.05) associations indicated with an asterisk*