Table 3.
Descriptions of provider-centered educational interventions
Authors | Year | Intervention | Sample Content or Description of provider specific content | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chamberlain et al. [42] Chamberlain et al. [43] |
2015 2016 |
Randomized controlled trial testing a multi-component intervention that included interventions on the patient- (interactive iPad-based tutorial, maps to local pharmacies/health departments), provider- (provider-to-patient talking points, peer-to-peer vaccine promotion education) and practice-level (vaccine champions, lapel buttons, posters, brochures) | Provider-to-patient talking points that emphasized protecting the fetus and newborn A 1-hour peer-to-peer education session that covered the importance of antenatal vaccination and tips for starting an in-house vaccination program |
9.0% received the vaccine overall. Study-adjusted antenatal influenza RD: 3.6%, 95% CI: −4.0, 11.2 [42] |
Hoppe et al. [31] | 2011 | Multi-component intervention to improve H1N1 influenza vaccine uptake among pregnant women in an obstetrics clinic | Educational sessions for team members in obstetrics clinic covering risk of H1N1 in pregnant women, vaccine recommendations and safety of vaccine | 76% of eligible patients received the vaccine (compared to national coverage of about 38%) |
McCarthy et al. [32] | 2012 | Retrospective assessment of a multi-component intervention that included education campaign for patients and providers. | Health center staff attended a grand rounds lecture. One of the authors attendant daily clinic meetings to provide additional information. No additional information was provided about the content of these interventions. | Influenza coverage increased from 30% to 40% from 2010 to 2011 (p = 0.03) |
Mouzoon et al. [38] | 2010 | Retrospective assessment of a multi-component intervention that included education updates for providers. | No specific information is provided about the content of the educational updates. | Rates among pregnant women increased from 2.5% at baseline to 21.1% (2003–2004), 30.6% (2004–2005), 32.5% (2005–2006), 40.5% (2006–2007), 46.5% (2007–2008), 37.4% (2008–2009). P for trend <0.01 |
Ogburn et al. [39] | 2007 | Retrospective assessment of a multi-component plan to improve vaccine uptake | Educational sessions for provider and clinic personnel. No information about the content of these sessions is provided. | 2002–2003 (<1% vaccinated) 2003–2004 (3% vaccinated) 2004–2005 (37% vaccinated) p<0.001 |
Panda et al. [40] | 2010 | Pre-/post-intervention assessment of a multi-component intervention to improve vaccine uptake | No information is provided about the content of the provider education sessions. | 2007–2008 (pre-intevention) - 19%; 2008–2009 (post-intervention) - 31% |
Wallis et al. [41] | 2006 | Pre-/post-intervention assessment of a multi-component intervention to improve vaccine uptake | Brief education sessions on the ACIP recommendations covering the indications, contraindications and side effects of the vaccine. | Proportion discussing before (1.5%), proportion discussing after (21.9%), Difference (20.5%) <0.001 |
Abbreviations: RD = risk difference