Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 18;2019(2):CD012873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012873.pub2

2. Dose intensity data for adjuvant studies.

Study Term used to represent dose intensity Taxane followed by anthracycline Anthracycline followed by taxane
Abe 2013 Mean relative dose intensitya Docetaxel: 95.2%
FEC: 98.9%
Docetaxel: 94.2%
FEC: 97.8%
AERO B03 2007 Median relative dose intensity Docetaxel: 96% (range: 25–104)
Epirubicin: 96% (range: 0–102)
Cyclophosphamide: 95% (range: 0–102)
Docetaxel: 81% (range: 0–102)
Epirubicin: 97% (range: 66–102)
Cyclophosphamide: 97% (range: 61–102)
Puhalla 2008 Mean relative dose intensity Docetaxel: 96%
Doxorubicin: 95%
Docetaxel: 82%
Doxorubicin: 96%
Wildiers 2009a Mean dose intensityb Docetaxel: 99%
FEC: 97%
Docetaxel: 97%
FEC: 97%
Wildiers 2009b (dose‐dense) Mean dose intensityb Docetaxel: 111%
FEC: 143%
Docetaxel: 108%
FEC: 146%

FEC: fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide.

aData used based on the reporting of findings in the abstract and Table 2 in the trial publication. The docetaxel and FEC percentages were switched in the text in the Results section. Therefore, the consistency of results presented in Table 2 and abstract were considered to be the most accurate reflection of the results.

bDefined as the dose intensity achieved in intervention or comparator arm for a participant who received all intended doses with no cycle delay or dose reduction.