Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 11;13:51. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00051

Table 4.

Relative effect of exercise type on peak metabolic parameters.

Characteristics Sedentary Aerobic Strength Aerobic + strength p
Peak VE (l/min)
Baseline 62.9 ± 15.3 (12) 63.5 ± 18.8 (11) 54.3 ± 12.9 (11) 62.0 ± 13.3 (11) 0.46
Intervention 59.9 ± 10.6 (9) 67.0 ± 22.2 (11) 60.6 ± 12.1 (9) 65.0 ± 14.3 (8) 0.72
p 0.87 0.93 0.51 0.89
12-week post 57.4 ± 13.1 (7) 73.2 ± 27.3 (11) 56.4 ± 12.4 (9) 64.9 ± 15.8 (7) 0.22
p 0.93 0.80 0.76 1.00
Peak VO2 (ml.kg-1.min-1)
Baseline 17.4 ± 3.9 (12) 18.9 ± 4.2 (11) 16.5 ± 3.8 (11) 18.9 ± 3.6 (11) 0.39
Intervention 17.0 ± 4.6 (9) 18.7 ± 5.1 (11) 17.2 ± 3.0 (9) 19.5 ± 4.5 (8) 0.59
p 0.98 0.99 0.87 0.95
12-week post 18.2 ± 4.6 (7) 19.3 ± 5.3 (11) 16.5 ± 2.2 (9) 20.6 ± 4.4 (7) 0.29
p 0.85 0.96 0.88 0.86
Peak RER (VCO2/VO2)
Baseline 1.2 ± 0.1 (12) 1.2 ± 0.2 (11) 1.1 ± 0.1 (11) 1.1 ± 0.1 (11) 0.11
Intervention 1.2 ± 0.1 (9) 1.2 ± 0.1 (11) 1.2 ± 0.1 (9) 1.2 ± 0.1 (8) 0.41
p 0.97 1.00 0.09 0.05
12-week post 1.2 ± 0.1 (7) 1.2 ± 0.1 (11) 1.1 ± 0.1 (9) 1.1 ± 0.0 (7) 0.03
p 0.98 1.00 0.11 0.08
Peak METS
Baseline 5.0 ± 1.1 (12) 5.4 ± 1.2 (11) 4.7 ± 1.1 (11) 5.4 ± 1.0 (11) 0.38
Intervention 4.9 ± 1.3 (9) 5.4 ± 1.4 (11) 4.9 ± 0.9 (9) 5.6 ± 1.3 (8) 0.55
p 0.98 1.00 0.88 0.93
12-week post 5.2 ± 1.3 (7) 5.5 ± 1.5 (11) 4.8 ± 0.6 (9) 5.9 ± 1.2 (7) 0.37
p 0.88 0.98 0.97 0.87

Data shown are the means ± SD of (N) patients. Data are analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison analysis. For within group analyses, baseline values are compared with intervention; intervention values are compared with 12-week post-intervention values.