Skip to main content
editorial
. 2019 Jan;8(1):99–108. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.12.08

Table 1. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as treatment of graft failure after heart transplantation: review of the literature.

Study Design Quality Patients ECMO survivors (discharged) Short-term outcomes (<30 days or in-hospital) Long-term outcomes
Tissot et al. (1) [2009] Retrospective, pediatric 3 310 HTx; 28 ECMO 15/28 (54%) Duration of support: survivors 2.8±0.6 vs. non-survivors 4.7±2.6 Among ECMO survivors:
❖ Three years survival: 100%;
❖ Long-term survival (8.1±3.8 years): 87%, deaths related to transplant CAD and chronic graft failure;
❖ Stroke: 27%;
❖ Normal graft function (SF 36±7%, EF 65±10%, CI 4.5±1.3)
Causes of death on ECMO support: HF (69%), sepsis (30%), bleeding (23%) (overlap)
Longer ischemic time in ECMO patients (276±89 vs. 242±70 min)
Chou et al. (9) [2010] Retrospective, adult 1 366 HTx; 40 ECMO 31/40 (78%) None of the patients receiving ECMO support for >4 days survived Late survival: 52% (survival details not reported)
D’Alessandro et al. (5) [2010] Retrospective, adult 3 394 HTx; 54 ECMO 27/54 (50%) Duration of support: 7±3 days
Complications during support: infection (65%), bleeding (26%), stroke (20%), mediastinitis (19%)
Among ECMO survivors:
❖ Three years survival: 94%;
❖ ECMO survivors have the same one-year and three-year survival of patients without early graft failure
Causes of death during support: HF (30%), sepsis (26%), bleeding (18%), stroke (18%), other (7%)
Marasco et al. (10) [2010] Retrospective, adult 2 239 HTx; 39 ECMO 29/39 (74%) Duration of support: 6.8±2.6 days Among ECMO survivors: similar survival of patients without early graft failure (survival details not reported)
Median blood products used: packed cells 5,890 mL, fresh frozen plasma 2,250 mL, platelets 2,130 mL, cryoprecipitate 300 mL
Complications during support: bleeding (38%), sternal wound infection (10%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (13%), renal failure (67%), pneumonia (46%), sepsis (49%), multi-organ failure (13%), limb complications (13%), stroke (8%). No differences in complications between central and peripheral cannulation
D’Alessandro et al. (11) [2011] Retrospective, adult 3 402 HTx; 91 ECMO 42/91 (46%) 33 patients died while on ECMO support: causes of death were low output cardiac syndrome (n=2), stroke (n=7), septic shock (n=10), postoperative surgical bleeding (n=7), refractory vasoplegia (n=6), and gastrointestinal bleeding (n=1) Among ECMO survivors: similar conditional 1-year survival rates as non-EGF patients (93% at three years and 91% at five years without EGF versus 93% at three years and 84% at five years with EGF)
Both patients bridged to total artificial heart died (stroke and septic shock)
21 patients died after weaning; causes of death were low-output cardiac syndrome (n=1), stroke (n=2), septic shock (n=11), hypoxic arrest during weaning after a tracheotomy (n=2), acute rejection (n=1), gastrointestinal bleeding (n=1), and iatrogenic hemothorax (n=1)
Two patients had refractory graft failure after removal of the ECMO. Both patients died after ECMO reimplantation due to surgical bleeding (n=1) and septic shock (n=1)
Mihaljevic et al. (12) [2012] Retrospective, adult 1 1,417 HTx; 43 ECMO Not available ECMO not differentiated from other TMSC in the presentation of results. Survival of patients requiring TMCS at one day, one week, one month: 94%, 66%, 43%, respectively Survival of patients requiring TMCS at one year, five years, and ten years: 40%, 37%, 29%, respectively
Complications during support: stroke (4%), device infection (4%), reoperation for bleeding (7%). Cumulative number of events increased linearly with duration of TMCS (rate of 0.34 events/patient per week)
Chen et al. (8) [2014] Retrospective, adult 1 447 HTx; 26 ECMO 12/26 (46%) Not reported Among ECMO survivors: similar one-year survival rates as non-EGF patients
Lehmann et al. (13) [2014] Retrospective, adult 2 298 HTx; 28 ECMO 15/28 (54%) All peripheral cannulations Among ECMO survivors:
❖ one-year survival rate: 63%±14%;
❖ Ten-year survival rate: 63%±14%
Duration of support: 4.2±2.9 days
Concomitant IABP use: 46%
Complications during support: bleeding (25%), gastrointestinal bleeding (28%), stroke (7%), deep sternal wound infection (4%)
Ventilation time 28.6±24.6 days
Blood products use, units: red blood cells 56±29, fresh frozen plasma 13±11, platelet 43±26
Causes of death during support: multiorgan failure (n=9), sepsis (n=9), lung failure (n=2), stroke (n=2)
Kaushal et al. (14) [2014] Retrospective, pediatric 2 92 HTx; 16 ECMO 9/16 (56%) Timing of cannulation: 50% in the operating room because of the inability to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass, 50% in intensive care unit (emergency) Among ECMO survivors:
❖ Five-year survival rate 40%;
❖ Graft function normal, and similar to non-ECMO patients (SF 42±3 vs. 40±2)
Duration of support: 5.4 days in survivors vs. 8.0 days in non-survivors
Re-initiation of ECMO support in three patients
Cause of death during support: cardiac failure with multi-organ failure
Su et al. (15) [2015] Retrospective, pediatric 2 203 HTx; 29 ECMO 18/29 (62%) Duration of support: 7.6±8.1 days Not reported
Causes of death during support: MOF (n=4), HF (n=2), stroke (n=1), sepsis (n=2)
Survival was not associated with gender, age, indication for HTx, past surgical history, ischemic time, CPB time, intra-operative or postoperative ECMO cannulation, time between HTx and ECMO, or duration of support
Loforte et al. (16) [2015] Retrospective, adult 3 119 ECMO; 26 HTx 19/26 (73%) Cannulation: peripheral (38%), central (62%) One-year survival: 57.6%
Duration of support, median: 8 days
Duration of support >6 days: 54%
IABP on ECMO: 100%
Intubation time, median: 10 days
Hospital stay, median: 21 days
Complications during support: dialysis (30%), reoperation for bleeding (46%), pneumonia (11%), liver failure (27%), multi-organ failure (27%), sepsis (4%)
Median blood products used, units: red blood cells 16.1, platelets 15.8, fresh frozen plasma 5.2
Re-transplantation: 15%
Loforte et al. (7) [2016] Retrospective, adult 3 412 HTx; 29 ECMO 13/29 (45%) Cannulation: peripheral (20.7%), central (79.3%) Among ECMO survivors: similar five-year conditional survival rate as HTx patients who had not suffered from EGF (88% without EGF vs. 84% with EGF treated with TMCS)
Duration of support: overall (7.9±6.4 days), peripheral (6.4±4.3 days), central (11.2±7.9 days)
Pre-HTx ECMO support: 44.8%
Mechanical ventilation time: 12.8±16.8 days
Intensive care unit stay: 28.2±20.4 days
Complications during support: leg ischemia (7%), reoperation for bleeding (38%), dialysis (55.2%), multi-organ failure (31%), stroke (10%), sepsis (24%)
Causes of death during support: multi-organ failure (47%), sepsis (36%), stroke (16%)
Takeda et al. (17) [2017] Retrospective, adult 3 597 HTx; 27 ECMO 22/27 (81%) Duration of support: 5.2±3.9 The three-year post-transplant survival was 41% in the VAD group and 66% in the ECMO group
Cardiopulmonary bypass time: 216±65 min
Aortic cross clamp time: 193±52 min
Blood products use during support: red blood cells 1,359±1,415 mL, fresh frozen plasma 1,916±1,728 mL, platelets 646±455 mL
Peripheral cannulation in 85%, no patient required left ventricular vent during ECMO support
Compared to ECMO, VAD implantation is associated with:
❖ Longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (323±86 vs. 216±65 minutes);
❖ Longer support time (14±17 vs. 5±4 days);
❖ Higher incidence of major bleeding requiring reoperation (77% vs. 30%);
❖ Higher incidence of dialysis (53% vs. 11%);
❖ Higher in-hospital mortality (41% vs. 19%);
❖ Lower weaning from support (59% vs. 89%)
Phan et al. (3) [2017] Systematic review 2 11,555 HTx; 535 ECMO1 57% Duration of support: 5.2 days Not reported
Complications during support: infection (34%), reoperation (34%), renal failure (29%), stroke (12%), device-related complications (7%)
Causes of death during support: sepsis (40%), stroke (34%), cardiac (26%) (weighted results)
Tran et al. (2) [2018] Retrospective, adult 1 224 ECMO; 62 HTx 30/62 (48%) Not reported Not reported

1, result of ECMO patients are generally presented as percentages and the precise number of ECMO patients is reported differently in the various sections of the text. Quality of evidence ranges from 1 to 3, with 1 indicating poor quality (missing information, methods not reported) and 3 indicating excellent quality for the purpose of this article. CI, cardiac index; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; EF, ejection fraction; HF, heart failure; HTx, heart transplantation; RV, right ventricle, SF, shortening fraction.