Table 3.
Adverse effect: categories | PK predictor | Parameter estimates (95% CI) | OR | P‐value† | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gastrointestinal | |||||||
Diarrhoea | 0 | Absence | Dose‐normalized AUCss0–12h (ng h ml–1 mg–1) | β 1 = –2 | (–2.97, –0.86) | 1.03 | <0.05 |
1 | Low | α 2 = –1.28 | (–1.92, –0.68) | ||||
2 | High | θ AUCN = 0.027 | (0.003, 0.05) | ||||
Dyspepsia | 0 | Absence | Dose‐normalized AUCss0–12h (ng h ml–1 mg–1) | β 1 = 1.73 | (0.69, 2.77) | 0.96 | < 0.05 |
1/2/3 | Presence | θ AUCN = –0.032 | (–0.063, –0.005) | ||||
Neurological | |||||||
Insomnia | 0 | Absence | Dose‐normalized AUCss0–12h (ng h ml–1 mg –1) | β 1 = –1.21 | (–1.92, –0.52) | 1.02 | < 0.05 |
1/2/3 | Presence | θ AUCN = 0.024 | (0.004, 0.04) | ||||
Neurological ratios | 0 | Absence | Dose‐normalized AUCss0–12h (ng h·ml–1 mg–1) | β 1 = –0.18 | (–0.97, –0.04) | 1.03 | < 0.005 |
0.14 | Low | α 2 = –1.5 | (–1.96, –0.97) | ||||
>0.28 | High | θ AUCN = 0.027 | (0.02, 0.05) | ||||
Cosmetic | |||||||
Skin changes | 0 | Absence | Dose‐normalized CMAX (ng ml–1 mg–1) | β 1 = –3 | (–3.94, –1.76) | 1.23 | < 0.02 |
1/2/3 | Presence | θ CmaxN = 0.208 | (0.02, 0.32) | ||||
Acne | 0 | Absence | Dose‐normalized CMAX (ng ml–1 mg–1) | β 1 = –3.24 | (–3.92, –1.78) | 1.22 | < 0.05 |
1 | Low | α 2 = –1.86 | (–2.93, –1.15) | ||||
2 | High | θ CmaxN = 0.201 | (0.03, 0.3) |
PK, pharmacokinetic; AUCss0–12h, tacrolimus area under the concentration curve at steady‐state between 0 and 12 h; CL/F, tacrolimus apparent oral clearance; θ CL, slope for tacrolimus CL/F effect; OR, odds ratio
θ AUCN slope for AUCss0‐12 h dose‐normalized effect; CMAX maximum tacrolimus concentration;
θ CmaxN slope for dose‐normalized CMAX effect
The probability pi of an adverse effect event is defined as follows:
For binary adverse effect events (dyspepsia, skin changes, insomnia), β 1 represents the underlying baseline for p(1), the probability of an adverse effect occurring. The probability of an adverse effect not occurring is defined as 1 – p(1)
For ordered categorical variables (diarrhoea, acne, neurological ratios), β 1 represents the underlying baseline for p(1), the sum of β 1 and α 2 represents the underlying baseline p(2). The probability of an adverse effect grade 2 occurring is p(2). The probability of an adverse effect grade 1 occurring is p(1) – p(2). The probability of an adverse effect not occurring (grade 0) is 1 – p(1)
Neurological adverse effect ratio represents a composite of individual rated adverse effects: tremors, headaches, insomnia 17, 18
The odds of interest increase by eθAUCN or eθCmaxN fold for every one unit increase in dose‐normalized AUC or maximum concentration. †The P‐value indicates the statistical significance of the PK predictor on the adverse effect model developed in NONMEM. The PK predictor was considered as significant if it showed a decrease of at least 3.84 points (χ2‐test, P < 0.05) in the objective function value from the initial logistic model