Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 12;13:31. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00031

Table 2.

Clinical outcomes in the active and sham ts-DCS groups.

Outcome Active ts-DCS (n = 19) Sham ts-DCS (n = 14)
Post hoc (p value) Post hoc (p value)
T0 T1 T2 Time T1 vs. T0 T2 vs. T0 T0 T1 T2 Time T1 vs. T0 T2 vs. T0
NPSI 37.4 ± 21.4 25.3 ± 13.8 21.0 ± 14.4 F(2,17) 5.175; p = 0.013 0.023 0.008 40.0 ± 17.9 34.3 ± 10.2 33.7 ± 13.2 F(2,12) 1.434; p = 0.277 n.s. n.s.
FSS 41.8 ± 13.4 41.1 ± 14.1 37.6 ± 11.5 F(2,17) 1.177; p = 0.331 n.s. n.s. 49.0 ± 12.1 47.2 ± 11.0 48.5 ± 13.0 F(2,12) 0.330; p = 0.725 n.s. n.s.
AS 1.75 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 0.8 1.8 ± 1.1 F(2,17) 0.643; p = 0.537 n.s. n.s. 1.2 ± 0.9 1.5 ± 1.2 1.2 ± 0.6 F(2,12) 1.200; p = 0.335 n.s. n.s.

Data are reported as mean ± SD. ts-DCS, transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation; NPSI, Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory; FSS, Fatigue Severity Scale; AS, Ashworth Scale; n.s., not significant (p value > 0.05).