Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 18;9:31. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0502-2

Table 1.

Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of cirrhotic patients with (Aspergillus +) or without (Aspergillus −) positive culture of Aspergillus spp

Variables Aspergillus +
n = 60
Aspergillus –
n = 148
p value
Age (years), mean (SD) 55.4 (12.6) 54.7 (11.5) 0.6
Gender (male), n (%) 51 (85) 125 (84) 0.38
Aetiology of cirrhosis, n (%) < 0.001
 Alcohol 25 (42) 106 (71)
 Viral 23 (38) 32 (22)
 Other 12 (20) 10 (7)
Comorbidities, n (%)
 COPD 23 (38) 20 (14) 0.001
 Immunosuppressive treatment 15 (25) 22 (15) 0.08
 Ascites 24 (40) 47 (32) 0.82
Life support n (%)
 Mechanical ventilation 31 (52) 77 (52) > 0.99
 Catecholamine 30 (50) 50 (34) 0.03
 Renal replacement therapy 13 (22) 13 (9) 0.01
 Liver support 7 (12) 5 (3.4) 0.02
Laboratory data, mean (SD)
 INR 2.01 (1.64) 2.4 (2) 0.23
 Serum bilirubin (µmol/l) 131 (159) 151(165) 0.056
 Serum creatinine (µmol/l) 155 (151) 149 (131) 0.98
 Serum sodium (mmol/l) 135 (5.3) 134 (7.7) 0.89
Prognostic score, mean (SD)
 Child–Pugh score 11.2 (2.8) 10.6 (2.3) 0.15
 MELD score 21 (11.2) 22,6 (9.8) 0.25
 SAPS II score 46 (20) 44 (19,7) 0.68
 SOFA score 9.8 (7.3) 8.6 (4.9) 0.55
ACLF grade n (%) 0.26
 ACLF grade 0 17 (28) 60 (41)
 ACLF grade 1 11 (18) 30 (20)
 ACLF grade 2 9 (15) 19 (13)
 ACLF grade 3 23 (38) 39 (26)
Outcome, n (%)
 Hospital mortality 20 (33) 52 (35) 0.8
 Liver transplantation 5 (8) 13 (9) 0.91

Significant parameters (p value < 0.05)

IPA invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, MELD Model of End-Stage Liver Disease, ACLF Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, ICU Intensive Care Unit, SAPS II Simplified Acute Physiology Score