Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 15;9(2):e01209. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1209

Table 2.

Voxel‐wise analyses of EAR maps between the HI and LI groups (under high family risk group)

High family risk group (high religion importance (HI)_VS_Low Religion Importance (LI))
Clusters Regions R/L MNI Coordinates T‐value Cluster size Increase or decrease
X Y Z
EAR
Thalamus Thalamus_L (aal)
Thalamus_R (aal)
−6 −10 −3 −3.4672 368
Temporal Lobe Superior Temporal Gyrus
Transverse Temporal Gyrus
R 39 −38 15 −7.0298 1,584
Frontal Lobe Insula
Extranuclear
R 31 7 15 −5.0186 1,227
Frontal Lobe Middle Frontal Gyrus L −21 29 49 −5.4561 287

Shown in the table are the significant differences when the individuals at high religion importance (HI) were compared with the individuals at low religion importance (LI) under high family risk group, with a design matrix of [1 − 1]. The threshold was set at a combined cutoff value of p < 0.001 (uncorrected) and a minimal cluster size of 100 voxels.

EAR, ellipsoidal area ratio; VS, versus; R/L, right or left; “↓” means decrease.