Table 4.
Study | Criteria | Risk of bias | Study quality |
Kuchay et al[11] | Random sequence generation | Low risk | Good quality |
Allocation concealment | Low risk | ||
Selective reporting | Low risk | ||
Other bias | Low risk | ||
Blinding of participants and personnel | Low risk | ||
Blinding of outcome assessment | Low risk | ||
Incomplete outcome data | Low risk | ||
Ito et al[12] | Random sequence generation | Low risk | Fair quality |
Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | ||
Selective reporting | Low risk | ||
Other bias | Low risk | ||
Blinding of participants and personnel | Low risk | ||
Blinding of outcome assessment | Low risk | ||
Incomplete outcome data | Low risk | ||
Shibuya et al[13] | Random sequence generation | Unclear risk | Fair quality |
Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | ||
Selective reporting | Low risk | ||
Other bias | Low risk | ||
Blinding of participants and personnel | Low risk | ||
Blinding of outcome assessment | Low risk | ||
Incomplete outcome data | Low risk | ||
Eriksson et al[14] | Random sequence generation | Low risk | Good quality |
Allocation concealment | Low risk | ||
Selective reporting | Low risk | ||
Other bias | Low risk | ||
Blinding of participants and personnel | Low risk | ||
Blinding of outcome assessment | Low risk | ||
Incomplete outcome data | Low risk |