Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 18;16:19. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0684-y

Table 6.

Percent distribution, percent and mean number of facilities by magnitude of referral out according to facility characteristics

Reported no women with complications and no referrals (n = 167) Reported referring women with complications
Referred > 50%a(n = 534) Referred 10–50% (n = 81) Referred fewer < 10% (n = 195)
Facility type
 Teaching & regional hospitals 0.0 0.0 1.2 5.6
 District hospitals 15.0 7.9 48.2 72.8
 Health centers 45.5 57.9 33.3 13.9
 Health clinics 14.4 14.4 4.9 4.1
 Maternity homes 16.8 16.5 9.9 2.6
 CHPS compound 8.4 3.4 2.5 1.0
Managing authority
 Public / government 62.9 66.3 70.4 48.2
 Private for-profit 31.7 19.7 19.8 27.7
 Private not-for-profit 5.4 14.0 9.9 24.1
Has electricity 90.4 94.4 92.6 98.0
Has source of water 68.3 70.9 75.3 89.7
Has mode of motorized transport 43.1 45.9 64.2 73.9
Has means of communication 32.3 35.4 55.6 80.5
Volume of deliveries
 Monthly mean 13.6 20.4 46.2 96.3
 Monthly range 3–96 3–286 4–259 3–1107
Mean EmOC readiness scoreb 3.8 3.9 5.0 6.0
Mean number of signal functions performed in last 3 months 3.5 3.7 5.7 6.9
Midwives on staff (n = 874)
 None 68.8 65.9 42.9 14.9
 1 19.2 23.4 26.0 22.1
 2–4 11.4 9.7 27.3 43.7
 5 or more 0.7 1.1 3.9 19.3
Has operating theaterc 14.2 6.2 48.2 79.0

aIncludes facilities that did not officially admit women with complications but had evidence of referring women

bEmOC readiness score is a composite measure of signal function readiness, where each SF is worth 1 point

cFirst column is based on n = 162; second column is based on n = 520