Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 7;21(3):392–403. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy124

Table 3.

Effect modification of cranial radiotherapy dose-response for risk of meningiomaa

N Total N Cases ERR/Gy 95% CI P Interaction
Model 1: All patients 1262 93 0.30 0.03–unknown
Model 2: Age at diagnosis 0.86
 0–4 y 2641 46 0.31 0.10–1.36
 5–9 y 1583 26 0.31 0.10–1.35
 10–17 y 1619 25 0.27 0.08–1.19
Model 3: Volume 0.98
 Partial 313 14 0.30 0.09–1.32
 Full 979 79 0.30 0.09–1.29
Model 4: Age at diagnosis and volume 0.55
 0–4 y / partial 86 6 0.52 0.13–2.49
 5–17 y / partial 227 8 0.22 0.05–1.06
 0–4 y / full 380 40 0.29 0.09–1.28
 5–17 y / full 569 39 0.30 0.09–1.32
Model 5: Sex 0.96
 Male 3269 47 0.30 0.10–1.29
 Female 2574 50 0.30 0.09–1.28

Abbreviations: ERR = excess relative risk; Gy = Gray; N = number; UNK = unknown.

aAll models adjusted for sex, age at diagnosis (<5, 5–9, 10+ y), cranial radiotherapy (no, partial, full). Coefficients for those variables were fixed at the values estimated in model 1 to improve stability of the model fitting. For likelihood ratio tests (P interaction), fixed parameters were counted as free, resulting in conservative P-values.

bDue to a very flat likelihood to the right of the maximum likelihood estimate, even much larger values are consistent with the data.