Tang and Krebs 2014.
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial
Study duration: 5 months Start date: January 2008 End date: September 2010 |
|
Participants |
Country and setting: USA (high‐income country); Denver, Colorado metro area Population: not reported Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Nutritional status: baseline mean LAZ: −0.66 in intervention group, −0.10 in control group Number: 42 Age: 6 months at beginning of intervention Sex: 17 boys, 25 girls (differentiation between intervention and control groups not provided) Typical diet: not provided |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: puréed meat and gravy; provision of 1 jar (71 g in total) by 7 months of age and 1 to 2 jars/d by 9 months of age Control: zinc‐ and iron‐fortified cereal; provision of 1 serving/d (15 g) by 7 months of age and 2 servings/d by 9 months of age |
|
Outcomes |
Primary:
Reported in separate studies (Krebs 2012b; Krebs 2013) Secondary:
Measurement:
Time points: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 months of age |
|
Notes |
Funding: supported by the Beef Checkoff through the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association and the National Institutes of Health (K24 DK083772) Declared conflict of interest: none declared Other notes: infants in the cereal group were instructed to avoid single‐ingredient meats. The authors note that this study was a secondary analysis on growth of a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the effects of fortified cereal and meat on zinc homeostasis and iron status in breastfed‐only infants (Krebs 2012b; Krebs 2013). |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Comment: randomization and assignment to study group was accomplished using a random number generating program by statistician with no contact with field team |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Comment: central assignment by statistician who had no contact with field team |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: unable to blind but unlikely to have affected outcome |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: anthropometric outcome measures obtained by research nurses with no knowledge of group assignment |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: attrition rates were balanced between groups (approximately 14%), and all reasons specified and balanced between groups |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: all prespecified outcomes reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Comment: funding partially provided by National Cattlemen's Beef Association |
CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention DRI: dietary reference intake HAZ: height‐for‐age z score LAZ: length‐for‐age z score LMIC: low‐ and middle‐income country (or countries) SAM: severe acute malnutrition WAZ: weight‐for‐age z score WHO: World Health Organization