Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 18;85(6):506–516. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.10.006

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Learning: effect of most recent reward on choice in high-lethality and low-lethality suicide attemtpers (coefficients from binary logistic mixed-effects models predicting stay/switch choice)

Legend. High-lethality (HL) suicide attempters are the reference group. Group sizes for low- vs. high-lethality attempters were 32 low, 22 high in Sample 1 and 28 low, 11 high in Sample 2. Effects of reward at stake not shown (reported in Figure 2D). Central dot and horizontal lines denote estimated regression coefficient and 95% confidence interval. X-axis shows the log-odds of switching vs. staying. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001