TABLE 3.
Measures | Single Rater | Cross Rater |
---|---|---|
Autoregressive Stability Paths | ||
G9 Delinquency—G10 Delinquency | .526* | .527* |
G9 Curfew Rules—G10 Curfew Rules | .507* | .376* |
G9 Discussions—G10 Discussions | .469* | .578* |
G9 Communication—G10 Communication | .508* | .471* |
Cross-Lagged Paths | ||
Predicting Changes in Delinquency From Aspects of Monitoring | ||
G9 Communication—G10 Delinquency | .003 | −.059 |
G9 Curfew Rules—G10 Delinquency | .041 | .037 |
G9 Discussions—G10 Delinquency | −.113 | −.037 |
Predicting Changes in Active Monitoring Efforts From Delinquency | ||
G9 Delinquency—G10 Curfew Rules | −.044 | .024 |
G9 Delinquency—G10 Discussions | .053 | −.047 |
Predicting Changes in Active Monitoring Efforts From Communication | ||
G9 Communication—G10 Curfew Rules | .013 | .023 |
G9 Communication—G10 Discussions | .145* | .092 |
Cross-Lagged Paths to Communication | ||
G9 Curfew Rules—G10 Communication | .017 | −.043 |
G9 Discussions—G10 Communication | .091 | .027 |
G9 Delinquency—G10 Communication | .070 | −.019 |
Cross-Lagged Paths Between Active Monitoring Efforts | ||
G9 Curfew Rules—G10 Discussions | .015 | .090 |
G9 Discussions—G10 Curfew Rules | .146* | .119* |
Note: N = 753. G9 = Grade 9; G10 = Grade 10; Discussions = parental discussions of daily activities; Communication = adolescent communication with parents.
p < .05.