Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 13;39(7):1301–1319. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3470-17.2018

Table 2.

Movement and SNR relationshipsa

HCS
22q11DS
Pearson r p Pearson r p
Movement
    Combined rs-fcMRI effects 0.09 0.60 0.26 0.09
    Thalamus-to-ROIa 0.17 0.31 0.26 0.10
    Thalamus-to-ROIb −0.18 0.27 −0.11 0.47
    Hippocampus-to-ROIa −0.13 0.44 −0.15 0.34
    Hippocampus-to-ROIb −0.20 0.22 0.15 0.35
SNR
    Combined rs-fcMRI effects −0.05 0.77 −0.18 0.26
    Thalamus-to-ROIa −0.16 0.33 −0.17 0.29
    Thalamus-to-ROIb 0.02 0.89 −0.05 0.75
    Hippocampus-to-ROIa 0.01 0.95 0.09 0.59
    Hippocampus-to-ROIb 0.04 0.81 −0.23 0.15

aPearson correlations showing no significant relationship between functional connectivity effects (mean Fz connectivity values) and measures of head movement (% BOLD frames scrubbed per subject) and SNR. Combined rs-fcMRI effects, linear combination of connectivity values from the thalamus and hippocampus to the two ROIs (ROIa and ROIb) derived from the Type I error-protected Group × Seed interaction analysis (see Whole-brain seed-based functional connectivity analyses). The linear combination was obtained as follows: [thalamus-to-ROIa + hippocampus-to-ROIb] − [thalamus-to-ROIb + hippocampus-to-ROIa]. Connectivity between each seed and ROI (e.g. thalamus-to-ROIa) was also individually tested for correlation with motion and SNR.