Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 15;5(1):e12. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.81

Table 2.

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses

Analysis Incremental costs (95% CI), € Incremental effects (95% CI) Mean ICER, € Distribution of cost-effectiveness plane
North-east quadrant, % South-east quadrant, % dominant South-west quadrant, % North-west quadrant, % inferior
PCT+AD (n = 71) versus antidepressants only (n = 79)
 Cost-effectiveness, depression-free days −3409 (−3458 to −3360) 34.1 (33.5 to 34.7) Dominant 1.9 93.1 4.5 0.4
 Cost-utility, QALYs −3409 (−3458 to −3360) −0.018 (−0.019 to −0.017) 184.912 saved per QALY lost 0.1 29.9 67.8 2.2
Antidepressants only (n = 79) versus PCT/−AD (n = 59)
 Cost-effectiveness, depression-free days −3015 (−3084 to −2947) 21.0 (20.2 to 21.7) Dominant 7.4 72.9 16.8 3.0
 Cost-utility, QALYs −3015 (−3084 to −2947) 0.051 (0.050 to 0.053) Dominant 7.8 80.8 8.9 2.6

ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; PCT+AD, preventive cognitive therapy and antidepressants; PCT/−AD, preventive cognitive therapy with guided tapering of antidepressants.