Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;112(6):320–328. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2018.1507784

Table 1.

Summary characteristics of the videos (N = 101).

Characteristic/Parameter Total count Median (range) or % (95% CI)
Video metrics    
 No. of views 8,769,304 24,124 (139 – 719,768)
 Likes 118,049 171 (0 – 15,844)
 Dislikes 5330 14 (0 – 542)
 Shares 41,077 166 (0 – 3446)
 Comments 27,940 95 (0 – 2367)
 No. of days in YouTube 299 (186 – 486)
 Popularity 79.18 (0.74 – 2617.6)
 Video length (minutes) 664.32 4.00 (0.23 – 38.92)
Video type    
 Informative 71 70.3 (60.8 – 78.3)
 Misleading 24 23.8 (16.5 – 32.9)
 Personal experience 6 5.9 (2.8 – 12.4)
Reliability score of the videos (DISCERN tool)* 2 (0–5)
 Aims clear and achieved? 62 61.39 (51.64 – 70.3)
 Reliable sources of information? 58 57.43 (47.69 – 66.62)
 Balanced and unbiased? 30 29.7 (21.67 – 39.22)
 Additional sources ofinformation for reference? 28 27.72 (19.93 – 37.15)
 Areas of uncertainty mentioned? 25 24.75 (17.37 – 33.99)
  Videos with total score 0 18 17.82 (11.58 – 26.42)
  Videos with total score 1 23 22.77 (15.68 – 31.86)
  Videos with total score 2 23 22.77 (15.68 – 31.86)
  Videos with total score 3 19 18.81 (12.39 – 27.52)
  Videos with total score 4 12 11.88 (6.93 – 19.63)
  Videos with total score 5 6 5.94 (2.75 – 12.36)
Content (domains addressed)    
 Epidemiology 60 59.41 (49.66 – 68.47)
 Clinical features & Complications 64 63.37 (53.64 – 72.11)
 Management & Prevention 41 40.59 (31.53 – 50.34)
  None of the 3 domainsaddressed 14 13.86 (8.44 – 21.93)
  All 3 domains addressed 4 3.96 (1.55 – 9.74)
Quality score of the videos (GQS tool)** 2 (1 – 5)
 Videos with score 1 24 23.76 (16.52 – 32.93)
 Videos with score 2 34 33.66 (25.2 – 43.33)
 Videos with score 3 25 24.75 (17.37 – 33.99)
 Videos with score 4 14 13.86 (8.44 – 21.93)
 Videos with score 5 4 3.96 (1.55 – 9.74)

Abbreviations: GQS, Global Quality Scale. *Refer supplementary Table 1 and **refer supplementary Table 2.