Table 4.
Revision and radiolucent lines after total knee arthroplasty with ceramic femoral prosthesis
| Author, year | Duration of follow-up (years) | Revision | Radiolucent line | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of knees | Breakage of prosthesis | Infection | Aseptic loosening | Instability | Wear | Others | Total | Rate of revision in total | Femoral | Tibial | Patellar | ||
| Akagi, 2000 [19] | 182 | 5.8 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4.40% | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Koshino, 2002 [20] | 90 | 4.67 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2.22% | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Laskin, 2003 [21] | 73 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.37% | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Bal, 2006 [22] | 36 | 2.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Majima, 2008 [23] | 110 | 5.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1.82% | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Iida, 2012 [24] | 107 | 5 (1–7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.93% | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Innocenti, 2014 [25] | 87 | 11.3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.30% | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Park, 2014 [26] | 84 | 5.16 (4.25–7.33) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 0 |
| Ahmed, 2015 | 303 | 9.7 (8.3–11.6) | 8 in total | 2.64% | 18 in total | ||||||||
| Bergschmidt, 2015 [27] | 109 | 4.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.92% | 4 | 9 | 0 |
| Bergschmidt, 2016 [28] | 21 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9.52% | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| Meier, 2016 [29] | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Nakamura, 2017 [30] | 37 | 11.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2.70% | 13 | 17 | 0 |
| Nakamura, 2017 [30] | 167 | 18.1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 24 | 14.37% | 44 | 3 | 0 |
| Grand total | 1438 | 3 | 16 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 52 | 3.62% | 67 | 72 | 3 | |
Duration of follow-up was presented as a mean value with range in the brackets