Skip to main content
. 2018 May 30;58(3):388–400. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key128

Table 2.

Strength and weaknesses of spinal imaging techniques in patients with AS

Imaging technique Strengths Weaknesses
Conventional radiography [3, 57]
  • Relatively less expensive and widely available

  • Relatively rapid review

  • Unable to visualize the thoracic spine reliably

  • Radiation exposure

  • Long duration (≥2 years) required to detect structural progression, precluding placebo-controlled trials

MRI [3, 57]
  • Detects inflammatory changes in bone and soft tissue

  • Does not use radiation

  • Tomographic method

  • Allows visualization of the thoracic spine

  • Long acquisition time

  • Scoring of MR images can be time-consuming

  • More expensive and less widely available than conventional radiography

  • Value in detecting new bone formation is limited

CT [3, 57]
  • Rapid technique

  • Tomographic method

  • Excellent visualization of bone

  • Allows visualization of thoracic spine

  • Sensitive method for detection of new bone formation

  • Use of ionizing radiation

  • More expensive and less widely available than conventional radiography