Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0211228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211228

Table 2. Summary of findings table–GRADE Approach.

Risk of hypertension and atrial fibrillation associated with Ibrutinib
Intervention: Ibrutinib; Comparison: Control
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI)
№ of participants (studies) Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) Comments
Risk with Control Risk with Ibrutinib
Hypertension 4 per 100 12 per 100 (7 to 22) RR 2.82 (1.52 to 5.23) 2580 (8 RCTs) ⨁⨁⨁○ MODERATE All studies had high-risk of bias due to selective reporting and only one trial had adequate blinding. Ibrutinib probably results in a large increase in hypertension risk.
Atrial fibrillation 1 per 100 5 per 100 (2 to 8) RR 4.69 (2.17 to 7.64) 2580 (8 RCTs) ⨁⨁⨁⨁ HIGH All studies had high-risk of bias due to selective reporting and only one trial had adequate blinding. The very large effect documented consistent (5 RCTs with RR>5.0) upgraded the quality of evidence, despite the risk of bias
Ibrutinib is likely to results in a very large increase in atrial fibrillation risk.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect

Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different

Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect

Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.