Table 4.
Dice overlaps with respect to the label-fusion majority voting amongst the five raters for segmentations performed using T1 MALP-EM maps re-labelled with “lesion” labels and the proposed registration-based labels in 8 cases of Dataset A.
| Case | With re-labelled T1 MALP-EM map |
With proposed registration-based map |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haematoma | Oedema | Haematoma | Oedema | |
| 1 | 0.772 | 0.821 | 0.910 | 0.849 |
| 2 | 0.796 | 0.766 | 0.849 | 0.788 |
| 3 | 0.852 | 0.767 | 0.857 | 0.773 |
| 4 | 0.927 | 0.870 | 0.893 | 0.889 |
| 5 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.776 | 0.848 |
| 6 | 0.843 | 0.899 | 0.847 | 0.889 |
| 7 | 0.955 | 0.931 | 0.953 | 0.932 |
| 8 | 0.834 | 0.808 | 0.937 | 0.813 |