Table 4.

Main results from the questionnaires

Design principles	Cycle #1	Modification	Cycle #2	Quotes
1. Multiple assessment data and multiple perspectives	All residents were able to deliver multiple assessment data prior to the CCC	No modification needed	All residents were able to deliver multiple assessment data prior to the CCC	Q14: ‘Collecting multiple data points and reviewing those again is a good thing. It made me realise again what my points for improvement are’
Extra	Residents felt that their performance was seriously discussed in the CCC	None	Residents felt that their performance was seriously discussed in the CCC	Q8: ‘It creates a broad picture of you as a person, as a doctor, about your strengths and weaknesses and not just a picture from one rotation or from one supervisor’
	All residents thought that there was too little time between the meeting, the feedback they got back and preparation for the next meeting	Feedback was delivered as soon as possible after the second meeting	They were satisfied with the early delivery of feedback and felt they had more time to work on the feedback before the next meeting	Q6: ‘The second CCC was too soon after the feedback from the first CCC. Therefore, the feedback from the second meeting was still the same’
	Some residents were not satisfied with the content of the feedback they received after the meeting	None (because this was outside the scope of our study)	Some residents were not satisfied with the content of the feedback they received after the meeting	Q11: ‘Feedback should be founded on concrete examples of behaviour, not on vague remarks like: ‘I had the feeling that […]’ Then it is just one person’s opinion
				Q3: ‘The feedback was exactly the same as during the latest rotation. I did not feel like the group added something to the opinion of my most recent supervisor’