Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 3;32(1):6–18. doi: 10.1007/s10278-018-0116-5

Table 6.

Comparing the performance of the proposed anatomical classification with state-of-the-art approaches

Method UW100 (%) UC100 (%) MIMICIII100 (%) Overall (%)
Proposed 83.5 83.4 80.6 82.6
kNN 63.7 68.5 60.2 64.1
RNN 74.7 66.6 63.3 68.1
Bi-RNN-CRF 76.2 74.6 68.5 73.3
SVM 69.8 62.3 58.6 63.5