Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 24;8(2):686–700. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1880

Table 2.

Immune‐related genomic signatures included in the study

Signature/author/year Outcome Number of genes in signature Patients with the signature classified asa Reference
Original Available (%) Poor (%) Uncertainty (%) Good (%)
95‐gene STAT1‐related immune metagenes; Desmedt et al; 2008. NA 95 69 (72.6) 48 (6.8) 411 (57.8) 252 (35.4) 17
B‐cell/IL‐8 metagenes; Rody et al; 2011. DFS 216 186 (86.1) 205 (28.8) 409 (57.5) 97 (13.7) 20
Immune cells metagenes; Nagalla et al; 2013. DMFS 70 52 (74.3) 61 (8.6) 393 (55.3) 257 (36.1) 19
HER2‐derived prognostic predictor enriched in immune genes; Staaf et al; 2010 OS DMFS 14 13 (92.9) 15 (2.1) 668 (94.0) 28 (3.9) 22
28‐kinase metagenes associated with immune response; Sabatier et al; 2011. DFS 368 275 (74.7) 286 (40.2) 163 (22.9) 262 (36.8) 21

DFS, disease‐free survival; DMFS, distant metastasis‐free survival; OS: overall survival.

a

Samples were classified as presence, absence, or uncertainty by respective published genomic signatures based on prediction result (false discover rate [FDR] < 0.05) of nearest template prediction (NTP).