Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 31;10(2):248–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.12.013

Table 1.

Overview of literature assessing Long Head of Biceps Disorders without rotator cuff tears.

Authors Study type Surgical procedure No of cases Average Age (years) LHB Disorder Follow up (months) Functional outcomes scores
Froimson 197584 Retrospective case series Open deltopectoral. Keyhole tenodesis (Floor of bicipital groove) 12 48 (25–61) Tenosynovitis, Rupture, Subluxation 24 (2–59) No
Becker 1988 Retrospective case series Open deltopectoral (Limited) .30 sutured to prepared bone in bicipital groove. 14 Keyhole tenodesis. 10 Transfer procedures to LHB 51 *51 (19–71) Chronic biciptal tendinitis 6 (1–36) No
Kelly 2001 Retrospective case series Arthroscopic Tenotomy 30 50 (16–75) LHBT tear, instability and chronic recalcitrant tenosynovitis 19 (12–69) ASES
Boileau 2009 Cohort study Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps tenodesis with interference screw 25 37 (19–57) SLAP II Tears 35 (24–69) CS
Tangari 2011 Retrospective case series Mini Open without arthroscopic assistance 5 32.6 (28–40) Acute traumatic LHB ruptures 91.2 (24–156) CS, MEPS
Delle Rose 2012 Retrospective comparative review Arthroscopic Soft tissue tenodesis Vs Tenotomy 104 48.3 (31–65) Partial tears, tendinoses, Pulley lesions and SLAP 51.6 (28.8–72) VAS, DASH, CS
Funk 2012 Retrospective case series Mini Open Subpectoral. 5 Interference screws. 6 Suture anchors 11 41 (23-65 Isolated Chronic ruptures 29(6–60) No
Said 2014 Retrospective case series Arthroscopic assisted and Mini Open subpectoral tenodesis with modified bone bridge technique 30 (25–48) Isolated LHB Pathology 12 to 18 CS, OSS
Shen 2014 Retrospective case series Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps tenodesis with suture anchors 49 56(37–65) Tendinitis, Ruptures, Subluxation and SLAP 14 (12–34) CS, ASES, UCLA
Werner 201485 Cohort study Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Vs Arthroscopic suprapectoral 82 Arthroscopic: 49.3 ± 7.2 Open: 52.3 ± 7.7 Isolated superior labrum or LHB pathology 37.2 (26.4–64.8) CS, ASES
Gombera 201686 Cohort study Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Vs Arthroscopic suprapectoral 46 57.2 (45–70) Partial LHBT tears, tendinitis, instability or with a tear of the subscapularis, SLAP 30.1 (21.1–44.9) ASES
Tahal 2017 Retrospective outcomes data with prospective collected data Arthroscopic + Open incision for subpectoral tenodesis 24 37 (29–45) Tenosynovitis 37.2 (24–87.6) ASES, SANE, SF12-PCS and MCS, Quick DASH, VAS
Vitali 2016 Retrospective case series Arthroscopic Biceps tenodesis(PITT technique) 60 48 (22–55) Tendinosis, tenosynovitis, subluxation, instability. SLAP II and IV 12 UCLA, VAS, CS
Green 2017 Retrospective comparative trial Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Versus Open Subpectoral 38 Open: 56.6 ± 10.7 Arthroscopic: 60.0 ± 10.2 All Biceps pathology without RCTs 54 (24–109.2) VAS, ASES
Schoch 2017 Prospective case series Arthroscopic assisted + Mini Open Suprapectoral using a suture plate 50 49 (23–75) Biceps tendinitis, tears, pulley lesions and SLAP 29 (22–32) CS, VAS, Scheibel LHBS

* Median not mean.

** Age in years.

CS- Constant Score. ASES American Shoulder and Elbow Score.

MEPS- Mayo Elbow Performance Score. VAS-Visual Analogue Score.

OSS- Oxford Shoulder Score UCLA-University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score.

SANE- Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation.

Quick DASH- Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand.

SF-12 PCS and MCS- Short form Physical and Mental Component Summary Score.

Scheibel LHBS- Long Head of Biceps Score.

WOSI- Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Score.