Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 14;4(1):138–142. doi: 10.1002/lio2.224

Table 4.

Binary Logistic Regression Analysis of Negative Effect of CI on Tinnitus (All Variables Included)

Variable B Standard error Significance (Wald) Exp (B) 95% Confidence interval
THI −0.027 0.046 0.552 0.973 0.890–1.064
THQ −0.027 0.038 0.488 0.974 0.903–1.050
DS14‐na 0.029 0.096 0.761 1.030 0.854–1.242
DS14‐si −0.165 0.104 0.113 0.848 0.691–1.040
APHAB −0.065 0.029 0.027 0.937 0.885–0.992
HADS‐a −0.094 0.203 0.644 0.911 0.612–1.355
HADS‐d −0.127 0.208 0.541 0.880 0.585–1.324

(P < .001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.559)

APHAB = abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit; CI = cochlear implantation; DS14 = type D‐scale; DS14‐na = type D scale negative affectivity; DS14‐si = type D‐scale social inhibition; HADS = hospital anxiety and depression scale; HADS‐a = hospital anxiety and depression scale‐anxiety; HADS‐d = hospital anxiety and depression scale‐depression; THI = tinnitus handicap inventory; THQ = tinnitus handicap questionnaire