Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;316(1):R76–R86. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00321.2018

Table 1.

Resting metabolite, pH, and ΔGATP before and after DCA treatment

Control (n = 6) DCA (n = 6)
Pi, mmol/LCW 1.61 ± 0.11 1.34 ± 0.16*
PCr, mmol/LCW 38.0 ± 1.21 37.2 ± 1.63
ATP, mmol/LCW 9.24 ± 0.7
PCr/ATP 4.01 ± 0.13 3.92 ± 0.18
pH 7.01 ± 0.02 6.98 ± 0.01
ΔGATP, kJ/mol −65.7 ± 0.22 −66.4 ± 0.30*

Values are means ± SE; n = 6 per group. Resting values were calculated from high-resolution spectra as seen in Fig. 2. Peak areas were quantified with NUTS line-fitting algorithm and normalized to total 31P peak area for each spectrum. Spectra were quantified with γ-ATP peak area at ATP concentration of 9.24 mM determined enzymatically in control white gastrocnemius muscle. pH was calculated via chemical shift of inorganic phosphate (Pi) relative to phosphocreatine (PCr) as shown in Eq. 1. Free energy of ATP hydrolysis (ΔGATP) was calculated as described in Eq 3. DCA, dichloroacetate; LCW, liter cell water.

*

Significant difference between control and DCA conditions (P < 0.05) by 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test.