Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;316(1):R76–R86. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00321.2018

Table 3.

Metabolic flux and steady-state ΔGATP in control and DCA treatment conditions

0.35 Hz (n = 6)
0.5 Hz (n = 7)
0.75 Hz (n = 6)
1.0 Hz (n = 7)
2.0 Hz (n = 6)
Control DCA Control DCA Control DCA Control DCA Control DCA
JATPase, mM/s 0.09 ± 0.04 0.19 ± 0.05 0.16 ± 0.02 0.21 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.04 0.34 ± 0.04 0.40 ± 0.05 0.87 ± 0.14 0.68 ± 0.11*
JGLY, mM/s 0.01 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.01 0.43 ± 0.08 0.40 ± 0.07
JMITO. mM/s 0.09 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.01 0.14 ± 0.02 0.18 ± 0.02 0.16 ± 0.02 0.27 ± 0.04 0.22 ± 0.02 0.32 ± 0.05 0.40 ± 0.16 0.40 ± 0.10
ΔGATP, kJ/mol −58.2 ± 0.3 −59.9 ± 0.4* −56.8 ± 0.4 −57.7 ± 0.6* −55.6 ± 0.3 −56.0 ± 0.4* −55.4 ± 0.3 −55.6 ± 0.4 −54.6 ± 0.6 −54.5 ± 0.3

Values are means ± SE, n = 6 or 7 per stimulation. Glycolytic ATP synthesis rate (JGLY), cytosolic ATP hydrolysis rate (JATPase), mitochondrial ATP synthesis rate (JMITO), and free energy of ATP hydrolysis (ΔGATP) were calculated as described in materials and methods. DCA, dichloroacetate.

*

Significant difference between control and DCA (P < 0.05) by 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test.