Skip to main content
Physiology logoLink to Physiology
. 2018 Dec 12;34(1):71–80. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00041.2018

Cardiac Vagus and Exercise

Alexander V Gourine 1,, Gareth L Ackland 2
PMCID: PMC6383634  PMID: 30540229

Abstract

Lower resting heart rate and high autonomic vagal activity are strongly associated with superior exercise capacity, maintenance of which is essential for general well-being and healthy aging. Recent evidence obtained in experimental studies using the latest advances in molecular neuroscience, combined with human exercise physiology, physiological modeling, and genomic data suggest that the strength of cardiac vagal activity causally determines our ability to exercise.

Introduction

Maintaining physical activity is essential for general well-being and healthy aging. Higher exercise capacity is strongly associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, malignancy, osteoporosis, depression, and premature death (14). Regular moderate exercise provides further health benefits (13, 50). It is well known that higher exercise capacity is strongly associated with lower resting heart rate and indirect measures of high cardiac vagal activity (16, 39), suggesting that the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system may play a key role in optimizing exercise performance. Despite the strong association between parasympathetic activity and exercise capacity, these data have long been interpreted as vagal activity merely being a marker for physical fitness. However, several lines of evidence obtained in studies of human exercise, physiological modeling, genome-wide association analysis, and experimental animal studies now challenge this assertion. In this article, we review these data, which collectively support the hypothesis that the strength of cardiac vagal activity directly determines the individual ability to exercise.

Exercise and Resting Heart Rate

Resting heart rate in healthy individuals is largely determined by the restraining influence of the vagus nerve on cardiac pacemaker cells located within the atrial nodal tissue, which typically generate action potentials at an intrinsic rate of ~105 min−1 (44). Experimental pharmacological blockade or surgical interruption of vagal cardiac innervation increases heart rate above this intrinsic rate (58). The resting heart rate in elite endurance athletes is low (values as low as 30 beats/min have been reported) and has been traditionally attributed to exceptionally high parasympathetic vagal tone in these select individuals (19, 76). D’Souza and colleagues, however, reported evidence (obtained in animal models) suggesting that the resting bradycardia associated with higher exercise capacity is primarily due to decreased intrinsic rate of cardiac pacemaker cells, established by training-induced downregulation of the pacemaker channel HCN4 expression (27). This view is also supported by the results of an earlier report that demonstrated reduced intrinsic rate of atria isolated from rats following exercise training (15). It remains to be determined whether the expression of HCN4 is modulated by autonomic activity, with high vagal tone potentially restraining HCN4 channel expression in the nodal tissue. Indeed, there is evidence that removal of cardiac vagal innervation prevents the (lowering) effect of endurance exercise training on resting heart rate in dogs (67). Parasympathetic vagal dysfunction induced by sinoaortic denervation was also reported to prevent endurance training-induced increases in baroreflex sensitivity and decreases in resting heart rate in rats (21). Although the mechanisms underlying resting bradycardia in athletes are under debate, the general consensus is that, in humans, superior exercise performance is strongly associated with lower resting heart rate as well as indirect measures of high cardiac vagal activity, which will be discussed next.

Assessment of Vagal Parasympathetic Activity in Humans by Measuring Heart Rate Recovery After Exercise

Although resting heart rate is largely determined by the vagus nerve, additional robust measures of cardiac vagal activity in humans were required. The interpretation of the most common measure, heart rate variability, is complicated by the fact that it appears to be strongly dependent on resting heart rate (63) as well as the frequency and depth of respiration (1). Although this measure is sensitive to systemic cholinergic blockade (5, 72), more recent analysis provided further evidence that even nonlinear indexes of heart rate variability are not reliable measures of cardiac vagal activity in healthy humans (20).

An alternative, highly reproducible measure of an individual’s ability to recruit cardiac vagal tone is the speed of heart rate recovery (HRR) after exercise. After heart rate peaks during exercise, a variably steep decline occurs upon cessation of exercise, termed heart rate recovery (FIGURE 1A). HRR after exercise is mediated by rapid vagal reactivation (25), as demonstrated by a markedly reduced rate of HRR in conditions of systemic muscarinic receptor blockade with atropine (43). Indicative of a causal relationship between the rate of HRR and exercise capacity, there is a dramatic absolute difference in HRR between the athletes and heart failure patients (43). Assessment of individual ability to recruit parasympathetic vagal tone based on HRR after exercise is independent of other physiological measures, including resting heart rate [a significant confounder in heart rate variability analysis (63)], tidal volume, and breathing frequency (1). Yet, reduced rate of HRR after exercise correlates with other indirect measures of cardiac vagal tone, including heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity, if these also suggest potential impairment of autonomic function (2, 3, 83).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Exercise capacity is reduced in subjects with cardiac vagal dysfunction

A: cardiopulmonary exercise test protocol for measuring the speed of heart rate recovery (HRR) after reaching peak tolerance. B: resting heart rate in subjects (n = 1,293), stratified by heart rate recovery 1 min after cessation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (HRR1). Numbers of subjects are indicated within bars. Resting heart rate is higher in the participants with reduced HRR. C: in the same subjects, percentage population-predicted peak oxygen consumption decreases with reduced HRR. Data are presented as means ± SE. B and C are adapted from Ref. 57, with permission from Nature Communications.

Four large clinical studies demonstrated a strong association between vagal dysfunction (as evident from a reduced HRR), cardiovascular morbidity, and all-cause mortality (22, 23, 45, 66). A 6-yr follow-up study in 2,428 middle-aged men, without a history of heart failure or coronary revascularization, reported that impaired HRR (defined as a reduction of 12 beats/min or less during the first minute after cessation of graded exercise) (FIGURE 1A) was strongly and independently associated with mortality (22). HRR is a strong predictor independently of workload, the presence of myocardial perfusion abnormalities, and/or absolute changes in heart rate during exercise. Subsequent studies including >20,000 individuals found a similar association, implicating parasympathetic autonomic dysfunction as a key factor contributing to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (22, 23, 45, 66) These data are also supported by the evidence showing strong association between mortality and baroreflex function (62), as well as resting heart rate (32, 89), the major autonomic determinant of which is cardiac vagal activity.

The strong association between low resting heart rate, measures of high cardiac vagal activity, and superior exercise capacity implies that cardiac vagal tone can be enhanced by exercise training. One longitudinal study performed in a group of untrained young individuals demonstrated that 6 wk of aerobic exercise training reduced resting heart rate and increased cardiac vagal tone, as assessed by heart rate variability analysis (6). Studies conducted in athletes (28, 59), patients with heart failure (64, 70, 82), and patients with Type 2 diabetes (11) have demonstrated that exercise training accelerates HRR, indicative of enhanced cardiac vagal function. These reports suggest that the vagal tone can indeed be “trained” by exercise, yet potential neurophysiological mechanisms (e.g., recruitment of more vagal neurons, increased excitability of vagal neurons, and/or more efficient transmission at the level of the ganglia) underlying this apparent plasticity of the autonomic nervous system remain unknown.

Genetic Determinants of Cardiac Vagal Tone

Although the emerging evidence suggests that cardiac vagal tone in healthy humans can be enhanced by exercise training, it is estimated from the results of twin studies that ~60% of HRR (and, hence, cardiac vagal activity) is determined genetically (65). Two recent genome-wide association studies conducted using data obtained in over 50,000 participants undergoing an exercise test (United Kingdom Biobank) aimed to identify genes that may be associated with heart rate response to exercise and HRR (73, 86). There was a broad overlap between the results of two studies, which identified at least 16 independent genome-wide significant signals across 23 genetic loci. There was, however, some discordance between the results of two studies, which may be related to the methodological differences in the assessment of HRR. Nevertheless, both studies found strong associations between the resting heart rate, HRR, and several genes expressed by the key components of the autonomic parasympathetic reflex signaling pathways, including acetylcholinesterase and muscarinic M2 receptors. Other “neuronal” genes at the various loci prominently associated with HRR are implicated in the processes such as the control of neurite outgrowth, synaptic plasticity, neurotransmission, and neuronal exocytosis.

Autonomic Control of the Heart During Exercise

The conventional view of autonomic control of the heart during exercise has long held that increases in heart rate from resting baseline initially occur through (complete) vagal withdrawal, followed by progressive activation of the sympathetic input (75) (FIGURE 2A). However, it appears that significant cardiac vagal activity is maintained during exercise (FIGURE 2B), as suggested by the results obtained in studies using autonomic blockade and baroreflex stimulation during exercise (89). Indeed, the model of on/off thresholds for vagal/sympathetic withdrawal/activation appears to be over-simplistic, especially if we consider that the pressor response (35) and the arterial baroreflex (34) contribute to the resetting of the heart rate control during exercise. The concept that cardiac vagal activity is maintained throughout exercise is based on the analysis and modeling of the results of experimental exercise studies involving pharmacological blockade of autonomic limbs in healthy human volunteers. At the onset of exercise, vagal activity indeed decreases as a result of central command and resetting of the arterial baroreflex (38). However, subsequent rapid increase in venous return recruits/maintains cardiac vagal activity through increased baroreceptor loading (88). Combined withdrawal of central command and attenuation of exercise pressor reflex sensitivity increases cardiac output without significant changes in the arterial blood pressure (81). As exercise workload increases, these mechanisms continually reset the arterial baroreflex (81). Accordingly, during exercise, the heart receives strong vagal and sympathetic modulation at rates below 140 beats/min (FIGURE 2B). At ~140 beats/min, sympathetic and parasympathetic influences are estimated to be approximately equal in strength, with sympathetic activity dominating heart rate control at higher exercise intensities (FIGURE 2B). In summary, studies of human heart rate control suggest that the resting heart rate is by ~80% attributable to vagal modulation, whereas heart rate control during intense exercise is ~80% dependent on sympathetic nerve activity (89). Thus, even at high exercise loads, vagal activity continues to modulate cardiac function along with heightened activity of the sympathetic nervous system. It is important to emphasize that the data supporting this concept are circumstantial and the dynamic changes in cardiac vagal activity during exercise with increasing workload have never been directly assessed. Although recordings of cardiac vagus in humans and animals are not feasible, changes in vagal activity during exercise can potentially be inferred from direct recordings of vagal preganglionic neuron firing during dynamic exercise in experimental animals. To the best of our knowledge, this experiment has never been performed. Yet, there is evidence obtained in experimental animal studies indicating that simultaneous co-activation of both autonomic limbs does occur in various conditions (68).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Autonomic control of the heart during exercise

A: schematic representation of the prevailing concept of parasympathetic and sympathetic control of heart rate during exercise. According to this concept, vagal withdrawal is responsible for heart rate increases up to 100 beats/min, followed by activation of the sympathetic input mediating further heart rate increases above 100 beats/min. B: schematic representation of the parasympathetic and sympathetic contributions to the control of heart rate during exercise proposed by White and Raven (89). According to this model, significant cardiac vagal activity is maintained during exercise. In healthy humans, at ~140 beats/min, sympathetic and parasympathetic influences are estimated to be approximately equal in strength, with sympathetic activity dominating heart rate control at higher exercise intensities. Yet, even at high exercise loads, vagal activity continues to modulate cardiac function along with heightened sympathetic activity. Schematic adapted from Ref. 89, with permission from the Journal of Physiology.

Significant cardiac vagal activity, which is maintained during exercise, could be functionally important in optimizing exercise performance. If this hypothesis is correct, then parasympathetic vagal dysfunction would be expected to be associated with impaired exercise capacity. We specifically determined the relationship between HRR and exercise capacity in 1,293 human participants over an age range (>65 yr old) when vagal function declines variably (57). A graded relationship between the speed of HRR, resting heart rate, and all prognostically relevant measures of exercise performance was found (FIGURE 1, B AND C). Decrements in HRR were also found to be strongly associated with reduced oxygen pulse (57), a robust surrogate for left ventricular stroke volume, suggesting that cardiac vagal activity may play an important role in modulation of ventricular contractility.

Central Nervous System Origins of Cardiac Vagal Activity

Cardiac vagal activity is generated by populations of vagal preganglionic neurons residing in two brain stem nuclei—the dorsal vagal motor nucleus and the nucleus ambiguus. These two distinct populations of neurons have different patterns of discharge and provide differential control of the cardiac function (Ref. 37; for a recent review, see Ref. 40). Neurons of the nucleus ambiguus are rhythmic, entrained by the neighboring respiratory network, and appear to exclusively control the nodal tissue and, therefore, the heart rate. Vagal preganglionic neurons residing in the dorsal vagal motor nucleus display a tonic pattern of discharge, which is maintained in an acute slice preparation (i.e., they are active in the absence of afferent input from the periphery and the rest of the central nervous system). A subpopulation of these neurons with cardiac projections is responsible for vagal modulation of the ventricular function (56).

It is important to keep in mind that all the existing measures of cardiac vagal tone in humans (including HRR), assess the activity of vagal projections that innervate the cardiac pacemaker cells and, thus, provide chronotropic control of the heart. For the purpose of this consideration, we assume (but cannot be sure without experimental evidence) that the strength of chronotropic vagal tone (generated by the nucleus ambiguus) parallels the activity of vagal projections innervating the atria and the ventricles (generated predominantly by the dorsal vagal motor nucleus). The functional significance of parasympathetic ventricular innervation is considered next.

Vagal Innervation of the Ventricles: Anatomical Evidence

Appropriate increases in cardiac contractility are essential to support the metabolic demands of the exercise. If cardiac vagal activity contributes to optimizing exercise performance, vagal innervation of the ventricles is likely to play an important role. Intrinsic cardiac ganglia harboring clusters of vagal neurons are located in the epicardium of the atria and the ventricular septum (31, 36, 80). There is significant anatomical evidence that these vagal neurons send extensive projections to all four chambers of the heart (8, 12, 74, 77, 90). Staining for acetylcholinesterase activity, immunohistochemical detection of choline acetyltransferase, and other anatomical methods demonstrated significant cholinergic innervation of the ventricular myocardium in all species studied so far (24), including mice (54), rats (34, 61, 67), dogs (47), pigs (26, 84), and humans (47, 69). A proportion of these cardiac vagal fibers synapse on sympathetic sites of release (inhibiting the liberation of norepinephrine “presynaptically”), whereas the others may directly innervate the ventricular muscle (51) (FIGURE 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Schematic illustration of dual innervation and key signaling mechanisms underlying control of cardiac function by the autonomic nervous system

Reciprocal inhibition prevents competitive effects taking place within the heart and is responsible for the phenomenon of a so-called “accentuated antagonism,” whereby the effect of increased activity of one branch of the autonomic nervous system is accentuated by cross-inhibition of transmitter release by the other branch (51). Mechanisms underlying modulation of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) and β-arrestin-2 (β-arr) expression by the vagus nerve remain to be determined. Cellular mechanisms downstream of cAMP and cGMP generation are not illustrated. AC, adenylyl cyclase; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; M2R, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2; sGC, soluble guanylyl cyclase; cGMP, cyclic guanosine monophosphate; β-AR, β-adrenoceptor.

Vagal Innervation of the Ventricles: Functional Evidence

Studies conducted in several species of experimental animals have demonstrated that electrical stimulation of the cervical vagus nerve causes stimulation frequency-dependent release of acetylcholine and nitric oxide (NO) in the ventricular myocardium (4, 18, 33, 41, 79). Ablation of vagal neurons of the intrinsic cardiac ganglia in dogs abolished ventricular acetylcholinesterase activity and prevented the effect of vagal nerve stimulation on the ventricular electrical properties (47). Another study conducted in rats specifically targeted the dorsal group of the brain stem vagal preganglionic neurons to express an inhibitory GPCR from insects (61) and demonstrated that this population of neurons has a tonic effect on the electrical properties of the ventricular myocardium (54). Acute inhibition of the dorsal vagal motor nucleus by application of a specific ligand of this invertebrate receptor shortened the ventricular effective refractory period, lowered the ventricular tachycardia threshold, and prolonged the QT interval (54). The vagal influences on the ventricular electrical properties appear to be mediated by complex interactions between cholinergic mechanisms and these mediated by NO produced by the neuronal NO synthase (7, 17, 46, 54, 55).

Collectively, these studies demonstrated that the vagus nerve modulates electrical properties of the ventricular myocardium, suggestive of direct, functionally significant innervation. Further studies explored whether projections of dorsal vagal preganglionic neurons may also modulate left ventricular contractility. That the electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve results in load-independent reduction of left ventricular contractility is well known (29, 30, 52). Whether the modulation of contractility by vagal ventricular innervation is tonic and functionally significant (at rest and during exercise) is less clear. The only human evidence is provided by the report showing that intracoronary atropine potentiates dobutamine-induced inotropic responses, and this effect is absent in the transplanted (i.e., denervated) hearts (48). In rats under conditions of complete sympathetic blockade (systemic β-adrenoceptor blockade combined with spinal cord transection), a tonic inhibitory muscarinic influence on ventricular contractility was evident following systemic administration of atropine or direct pharmacological or genetic inhibition of the dorsal group of vagal preganglionic neurons (56). The strength of vagal modulation of ventricular contractility was dependent on the type of the anesthetic used in these studies, an important confounding factor in the experiments of this type, considering the high sensitivity of vagal neurons to these agents (87).

There is also evidence that the activity of dorsal vagal preganglionic neurons can effectively protect (via a muscarinic mechanism) ventricular cardiomyocytes against acute ischemia/reperfusion injury (61). These neurons appear to be critically important for the operation of the innate reflex mechanisms that mediate inter-organ protection against ischemia/reperfusion myocardial injury (through the phenomenon of remote ischemic preconditioning cardioprotection) (61). These protective reflexes may recruit direct ventricular projections of vagal neurons as well as vagal innervation of the visceral organs and activation of mechanisms involving systemic actions of cardiotropic gut hormones, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (7, 10, 60).

Exercise Capacity is Determined by Vagal Activity: Molecular Neuroscience Data Demonstrating Causality

Recent advances in molecular neuroscience allow precise control of neuronal activity with unprecedented specificity, spatial resolution, and temporal resolution (9). This is particularly important for studies of parasympathetic mechanisms, considering that the vagus is a mixed nerve containing motor (efferent) and sensory (afferent) fibers, making data obtained with the use of electrical stimulation sometimes difficult to interpret. Indeed, electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve at the cervical level has many shortcomings, not least because of the uncertainty as to which vagal fibers (afferent or efferent) are activated by electrical pulses, but also because of the potential recruitment of sympathetic axons that join the vagal trunk (78, 85). A refined approach (to avoid the drawbacks inherent to indiscriminate nature of nerve sectioning, systemic pharmacological blockade, and/or electrical stimulation) to inhibit or stimulate vagal efferent activity would require cell-specific genetic targeting of vagal preganglionic neurons to express membrane proteins, allowing control of their activity using light or specific ligands. This was achieved in rats by using viral vectors to target dorsal vagal preganglionic neurons to express either inhibitory GPCRs from insects [which could be activated by invertebrate peptides that do not have endogenous receptors in mammals (49)] (FIGURE 4A) or light-sensitive cation channels from algae (53, 61).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Exercise capacity is determined by the activity of vagal preganglionic neurons that reside in the dorsal vagal motor nucleus of the brain stem

A: genetic targeting of the dorsal vagal motor nucleus (DVMN) vagal preganglionic neurons in rats to express an inhibitory Gi-protein-coupled Drosophila allatostatin receptor. Left: Schematic drawings of the rat brain in saggital and coronal projections, illustrating the anatomical location of the DVMN. Right: photomicrograph of a representative coronal section of the rat dorsal brain stem, illustrating the distribution of the DVMN neurons transduced to express the receptor in the caudal region of the nucleus. Arrows point at ventrally projecting axons of the transduced vagal neurons (forming the efferent vagus nerve). XII, hypoglossal motor nucleus (cells are not visible); eGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein; CC, central canal. Scale bar: 200 µm. B: summary data illustrating the effect of allatostatin receptor ligand (insect peptide allatostatin) administration on exercise capacity in rats transduced to express control transgene (left) or allatostatin receptor (right) by the DVMN neurons. Allatostatin binding to allatostatin receptor results in rapid and reversible silencing of mammalian neurons transduced to express this receptor (49, 61). Data are presented as individual values and means ± SE. Comparisons are made using ANOVA. Figure adapted from Ref. 57, with permission from Nature Communications.

Exercise capacity was assessed in animals transduced to express the insect inhibitory GPCR, light-sensitive channels, and respective control transgenes in neurons of the dorsal vagal motor nucleus (57). Experimental and control groups shared similar exercise capacity at baseline; however, acute silencing of the dorsal vagal preganglionic neurons reversibly reduced exercise capacity by ~80% (FIGURE 4B). Since chronotropic control of the heart is provided by neurons of the nucleus ambiguus located ventrally in the brain stem (37, 40), the effect of silencing the dorsal population of vagal neurons is likely to be due to impaired exercise-evoked ventricular and/or functional systemic hemodynamic changes, as suggested by the results of human studies.

The same study demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation of this population of vagal neurons enhances cardiac contractility and prolongs exercise endurance (57). Mechanistic insight was provided by the evidence showing that recruitment of vagal activity by optogenetic stimulation of these neurons was associated with reduced myocardial expression of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) and β-arrestin 2 (57). This observation is important since these proteins are critical components of the intracellular machinery that controls the efficacy of β-adrenoceptor-mediated signaling in cardiomyocytes. GRKs promote phosphorylation of the intracellular domains of β-adrenoceptors, recruiting arrestins to block receptor coupling to G-proteins resulting in receptor desensitization and internalization (42) (FIGURE 3). Reduced, or inducible ablation of, cardiac GRK2 expression improves cardiac function in low exercise capacity states such as heart failure (71). These data obtained in experimental animals suggest that vagal activity may control cardiac responsiveness to sympathetic stimulation via modulation of expression of key negative regulators of β-adrenoceptor-mediated signaling.

Conclusions

The basic science and clinical data discussed in this article challenge the long-held prevailing view that the strength of cardiac vagal tone is merely a marker of physical fitness. The key points discussed above can be condensed as follows:

  • • 

    The speed of heart rate recovery after exercise provides a robust measure of cardiac vagal activity, which is strongly associated with exercise capacity, cardiovascular morbidity, and all-cause mortality in humans.

  • • 

    In health, the cardiac vagal activity is largely determined by the genetic factors, with strong associations identified between HRR and several genes expressed by the key components of autonomic reflex signaling pathways.

  • • 

    Cardiac vagal activity may be enhanced further even in healthy individuals through exercise training.

  • • 

    A significant level of cardiac vagal activity is maintained during exercise.

  • • 

    The vagus nerve provides functional innervation of the ventricles. Cardiac projections of a dorsal group of vagal preganglionic neurons modulate ventricular excitability, contractility, and responsiveness of the ventricular myocardium to β-adrenoceptor stimulation.

  • • 

    Inhibition of vagal neurons impairs exercise capacity, whereas vagal stimulation enhances cardiac contractility and prolongs exercise endurance (in experimental animals).

The most logical conclusion from these lines of evidence is that the strength of cardiac vagal activity causally determines our ability to exercise. High cardiac vagal tone in elite athletes may be critically important to confer higher tolerance for intense training regimes essential to achieve superior athletic performance. On the other hand, and in accord with this hypothesis, development of the pathology associated with progressive or acute parasympathetic dysfunction invariably parallels the decline in aerobic exercise capacity. Pharmacological or device-based neuromodulation approaches allowing selective recruitment of cardiac vagal activity may prove to be effective in enhancing the exercise capacity and promoting cardiovascular health across the lifespan.

Acknowledgments

Results of the authors’ experimental studies described in this review article were obtained with generous support of the Wellcome Trust (ref. no. 200893) and British Heart Foundation (RG/14/4/30736). A.V.G is a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellow. G.L.A. is supported by a British Journal of Anaesthesia/Royal College of Anaesthetists basic science Career Development award and a British Oxygen Company research chair grant in anesthesia from the Royal College of Anaesthetists.

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

A.V.G. and G.L.A. prepared figures; A.V.G. and G.L.A. drafted manuscript; A.V.G. and G.L.A. edited and revised manuscript; A.V.G. and G.L.A. approved final version of manuscript.

References

  • 1.Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation 93: 1043–1065, 1996. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ackland GL, Minto G, Clark M, Whittle J, Stephens RCM, Owen T, Prabhu P, Del Arroyo AG. Autonomic regulation of systemic inflammation in humans: A multi-center, blinded observational cohort study. Brain Behav Immun 67: 47–53, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ackland GL, Whittle J, Toner A, Machhada A, Del Arroyo AG, Sciuso A, Jenkins N, Dyson A, Struthers R, Sneyd JR, Minto G, Singer M, Shah AM, Gourine AV. Molecular mechanisms linking autonomic dysfunction and impaired cardiac contractility in critical illness. Crit Care Med 44: e614–e624, 2016. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Akiyama T, Yamazaki T. Effects of right and left vagal stimulation on left ventricular acetylcholine levels in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand 172: 11–16, 2001. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2001.00812.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Akselrod S, Gordon D, Ubel FA, Shannon DC, Berger AC, Cohen RJ. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 213: 220–222, 1981. doi: 10.1126/science.6166045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.al-Ani M, Munir SM, White M, Townend J, Coote JH. Changes in R-R variability before and after endurance training measured by power spectral analysis and by the effect of isometric muscle contraction. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 74: 397–403, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ang R, Mastitskaya S, Hosford PS, Basalay M, Specterman M, Aziz Q, Li Y, Orini M, Taggart P, Lambiase PD, Gourine A, Tinker A, Gourine AV. Modulation of cardiac ventricular excitability by GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 11: e006740, 2018. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Armour JA. Potential clinical relevance of the ‘little brain’ on the mammalian heart. Exp Physiol 93: 165–176, 2008. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.041178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aston-Jones G, Deisseroth K. Recent advances in optogenetics and pharmacogenetics. Brain Res 1511: 1–5, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.01.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Basalay MV, Mastitskaya S, Mrochek A, Ackland GL, Del Arroyo AG, Sanchez J, Sjoquist PO, Pernow J, Gourine AV, Gourine A. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) mediates cardioprotection by remote ischaemic conditioning. Cardiovasc Res 112: 669–676, 2016. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvw216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bhati P, Shenoy S, Hussain ME. Exercise training and cardiac autonomic function in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Syndr 12: 69–78, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2017.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Billman GE, Hoskins RS, Randall DC, Randall WC, Hamlin RL, Lin YC. Selective vagal postganglionic innervation of the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes in the non-human primate. J Auton Nerv Syst 26: 27–36, 1989. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(89)90104-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Blair SN, Kohl HW III, Barlow CE, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Gibbons LW, Macera CA. Changes in physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men. JAMA 273: 1093–1098, 1995. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520380029031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Blair SN, Kohl HW III, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA 262: 2395–2401, 1989. doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03430170057028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bolter CP, Hughson RL, Critz JB. Intrinsic rate and cholinergic sensitivity of isolated atria from trained and sedentary rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 144: 364–367, 1973. doi: 10.3181/00379727-144-37592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Boutcher SH, Stein P. Association between heart rate variability and training response in sedentary middle-aged men. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 70: 75–80, 1995. doi: 10.1007/BF00601812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brack KE, Coote JH, Ng GA. Vagus nerve stimulation protects against ventricular fibrillation independent of muscarinic receptor activation. Cardiovasc Res 91: 437–446, 2011. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brack KE, Patel VH, Mantravardi R, Coote JH, Ng GA. Direct evidence of nitric oxide release from neuronal nitric oxide synthase activation in the left ventricle as a result of cervical vagus nerve stimulation. J Physiol 587: 3045–3054, 2009. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.169417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carter JB, Banister EW, Blaber AP. Effect of endurance exercise on autonomic control of heart rate. Sports Med 33: 33–46, 2003. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cepeda FX, Lapointe M, Tan CO, Andrew Taylor J. Inconsistent relation of nonlinear heart rate variability indices to increasing vagal tone in healthy humans. Auton Neurosci 213: 1–7, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2018.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ceroni A, Chaar LJ, Bombein RL, Michelini LC. Chronic absence of baroreceptor inputs prevents training-induced cardiovascular adjustments in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Exp Physiol 94: 630–640, 2009. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.046128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Snader CE, Lauer MS. Heart-rate recovery immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality. N Engl J Med 341: 1351–1357, 1999. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910283411804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cole CR, Foody JM, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise testing as a predictor of mortality in a cardiovascularly healthy cohort. Ann Intern Med 132: 552–555, 2000. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-7-200004040-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Coote JH. Myths and realities of the cardiac vagus. J Physiol 591: 4073–4085, 2013. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.257758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Coote JH. Recovery of heart rate following intense dynamic exercise. Exp Physiol 95: 431–440, 2010. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2009.047548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Crick SJ, Anderson RH, Ho SY, Sheppard MN. Localisation and quantitation of autonomic innervation in the porcine heart II: endocardium, myocardium and epicardium. J Anat 195: 359–373, 1999. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1999.19530359.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.D’Souza A, Bucchi A, Johnsen AB, Logantha SJ, Monfredi O, Yanni J, Prehar S, Hart G, Cartwright E, Wisloff U, Dobryznski H, DiFrancesco D, Morris GM, Boyett MR. Exercise training reduces resting heart rate via downregulation of the funny channel HCN4. Nat Commun 5: 3775, 2014. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Daanen HA, Lamberts RP, Kallen VL, Jin A, Van Meeteren NL. A systematic review on heart-rate recovery to monitor changes in training status in athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 7: 251–260, 2012. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.7.3.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Degeest H, Levy MN, Zieske H. Negative inotropic effect of the vagus nerves upon the canine ventricle. Science 144: 1223–1225, 1964. doi: 10.1126/science.144.3623.1223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Degeest H, Levy MN, Zieske H, Lipman RI. Depression of ventricular contractility by stimulation of the vagus nerves. Circ Res 17: 222–235, 1965. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.17.3.222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dickerson LW, Rodak DJ, Fleming TJ, Gatti PJ, Massari VJ, McKenzie JC, Gillis RA. Parasympathetic neurons in the cranial medial ventricular fat pad on the dog heart selectively decrease ventricular contractility. J Auton Nerv Syst 70: 129–141, 1998. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1838(98)00048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Eckberg DL, Drabinsky M, Braunwald E. Defective cardiac parasympathetic control in patients with heart disease. N Engl J Med 285: 877–883, 1971. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197110142851602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Eliakim M, Bellet S, Tawil E, Muller O. Effect of vagal stimulation and acetylcholine on the ventricle. Studies in dogs with complete atrioventricular block. Circ Res 9: 1372–1379, 1961. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fadel PJ, Ogoh S, Watenpaugh DE, Wasmund W, Olivencia-Yurvati A, Smith ML, Raven PB. Carotid baroreflex regulation of sympathetic nerve activity during dynamic exercise in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H1383–H1390, 2001. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.3.H1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fisher JP. Autonomic control of the heart during exercise in humans: role of skeletal muscle afferents. Exp Physiol 99: 300–305, 2014. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.074377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gatti PJ, Johnson TA, McKenzie J, Lauenstein JM, Gray A, Massari VJ. Vagal control of left ventricular contractility is selectively mediated by a cranioventricular intracardiac ganglion in the cat. J Auton Nerv Syst 66: 138–144, 1997. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1838(97)00071-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Geis GS, Wurster RD. Cardiac responses during stimulation of the dorsal motor nucleus and nucleus ambiguus in the cat. Circ Res 46: 606–611, 1980. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.46.5.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gladwell VF, Coote JH. Heart rate at the onset of muscle contraction and during passive muscle stretch in humans: a role for mechanoreceptors. J Physiol 540: 1095–1102, 2002. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Goldsmith RL, Bigger JT Jr, Bloomfield DM, Steinman RC. Physical fitness as a determinant of vagal modulation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29: 812–817, 1997. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199706000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gourine AV, Machhada A, Trapp S, Spyer KM. Cardiac vagal preganglionic neurones: An update. Auton Neurosci 199: 24–28, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2016.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hare JM, Keaney JF Jr, Balligand JL, Loscalzo J, Smith TW, Colucci WS. Role of nitric oxide in parasympathetic modulation of beta-adrenergic myocardial contractility in normal dogs. J Clin Invest 95: 360–366, 1995. doi: 10.1172/JCI117664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hullmann J, Traynham CJ, Coleman RC, Koch WJ. The expanding GRK interactome: Implications in cardiovascular disease and potential for therapeutic development. Pharmacol Res 110: 52–64, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Imai K, Sato H, Hori M, Kusuoka H, Ozaki H, Yokoyama H, Takeda H, Inoue M, Kamada T. Vagally mediated heart rate recovery after exercise is accelerated in athletes but blunted in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 24: 1529–1535, 1994. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90150-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jose AD, Collison D. The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man. Cardiovasc Res 4: 160–167, 1970. doi: 10.1093/cvr/4.2.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jouven X, Empana JP, Schwartz PJ, Desnos M, Courbon D, Ducimetière P. Heart-rate profile during exercise as a predictor of sudden death. N Engl J Med 352: 1951–1958, 2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kalla M, Chotalia M, Coughlan C, Hao G, Crabtree MJ, Tomek J, Bub G, Paterson DJ, Herring N. Protection against ventricular fibrillation via cholinergic receptor stimulation and the generation of nitric oxide. J Physiol 594: 3981–3992, 2016. doi: 10.1113/JP271588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kent KM, Epstein SE, Cooper T, Jacobowitz DM. Cholinergic innervation of the canine and human ventricular conducting system. Anatomic and electrophysiologic correlations. Circulation 50: 948–955, 1974. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.50.5.948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Landzberg JS, Parker JD, Gauthier DF, Colucci WS. Effects of intracoronary acetylcholine and atropine on basal and dobutamine-stimulated left ventricular contractility. Circulation 89: 164–168, 1994. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.89.1.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lechner HA, Lein ES, Callaway EM. A genetic method for selective and quickly reversible silencing of mammalian neurons. J Neurosci 22: 5287–5290, 2002. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05287.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lee IM, Hsieh CC, Paffenbarger RS Jr. Exercise intensity and longevity in men. The Harvard Alumni Health Study. JAMA 273: 1179–1184, 1995. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520390039030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Levy MN. Sympathetic-parasympathetic interactions in the heart. Circ Res 29: 437–445, 1971. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.29.5.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lewis ME, Al-Khalidi AH, Bonser RS, Clutton-Brock T, Morton D, Paterson D, Townend JN, Coote JH. Vagus nerve stimulation decreases left ventricular contractility in vivo in the human and pig heart. J Physiol 534: 547–552, 2001. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00547.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lin JY, Lin MZ, Steinbach P, Tsien RY. Characterization of engineered channelrhodopsin variants with improved properties and kinetics. Biophys J 96: 1803–1814, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.11.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Machhada A, Ang R, Ackland GL, Ninkina N, Buchman VL, Lythgoe MF, Trapp S, Tinker A, Marina N, Gourine AV. Control of ventricular excitability by neurons of the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve. Heart Rhythm 12: 2285–2293, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Machhada A, Ang R, Ackland GL, Ninkina NN, Buchman VL, Lythgoe MF, Trapp S, Tinker A, Marina N, Gourine AV. Reduced activity of dorsal vagal preganglionic neurones associated with synuclein pathology predisposes the heart to ventricular arrhythmia. Eur Heart J 36: 215, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Machhada A, Marina N, Korsak A, Stuckey DJ, Lythgoe MF, Gourine AV. Origins of the vagal drive controlling left ventricular contractility. J Physiol 594: 4017–4030, 2016. doi: 10.1113/JP270984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Machhada A, Trapp S, Marina N, Stephens RCM, Whittle J, Lythgoe MF, Kasparov S, Ackland GL, Gourine AV. Vagal determinants of exercise capacity. Nat Commun 8: 15097, 2017. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Maciel BC, Gallo Júnior L, Marin Neto JA, Lima Filho EC, Terra Filho J, Manço JC. Parasympathetic contribution to bradycardia induced by endurance training in man. Cardiovasc Res 19: 642–648, 1985. doi: 10.1093/cvr/19.10.642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mann TN, Webster C, Lamberts RP, Lambert MI. Effect of exercise intensity on post-exercise oxygen consumption and heart rate recovery. Eur J Appl Physiol 114: 1809–1820, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2907-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mastitskaya S, Basalay M, Hosford PS, Ramage AG, Gourine A, Gourine AV. Identifying the source of a humoral factor of remote (pre)conditioning cardioprotection. PLoS One 11: e0150108, 2016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mastitskaya S, Marina N, Gourine A, Gilbey MP, Spyer KM, Teschemacher AG, Kasparov S, Trapp S, Ackland GL, Gourine AV. Cardioprotection evoked by remote ischaemic preconditioning is critically dependent on the activity of vagal pre-ganglionic neurones. Cardiovasc Res 95: 487–494, 2012. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvs212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.McCrory C, Berkman LF, Nolan H, O’Leary N, Foley M, Kenny RA. Speed of heart rate recovery in response to orthostatic challenge. Circ Res 119: 666–675, 2016. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Monfredi O, Lyashkov AE, Johnsen AB, Inada S, Schneider H, Wang R, Nirmalan M, Wisloff U, Maltsev VA, Lakatta EG, Zhang H, Boyett MR. Biophysical characterization of the underappreciated and important relationship between heart rate variability and heart rate. Hypertension 64: 1334–1343, 2014. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Myers J, Hadley D, Oswald U, Bruner K, Kottman W, Hsu L, Dubach P. Effects of exercise training on heart rate recovery in patients with chronic heart failure. Am Heart J 153: 1056–1063, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nederend I, Schutte NM, Bartels M, Ten Harkel AD, de Geus EJ. Heritability of heart rate recovery and vagal rebound after exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 116: 2167–2176, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3459-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Nishime EO, Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery and treadmill exercise score as predictors of mortality in patients referred for exercise ECG. JAMA 284: 1392–1398, 2000. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.11.1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ordway GA, Charles JB, Randall DC, Billman GE, Wekstein DR. Heart rate adaptation to exercise training in cardiac-denervated dogs. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 52: 1586–1590, 1982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Paton JF, Boscan P, Pickering AE, Nalivaiko E. The yin and yang of cardiac autonomic control: vago-sympathetic interactions revisited. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 49: 555–565, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pauza DH, Skripka V, Pauziene N, Stropus R. Morphology, distribution, and variability of the epicardiac neural ganglionated subplexuses in the human heart. Anat Rec 259: 353–382, 2000. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pearson MJ, Smart NA. Exercise therapy and autonomic function in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev 23: 91–108, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s10741-017-9662-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Penela P, Murga C, Ribas C, Tutor AS, Peregrín S, Mayor F Jr. Mechanisms of regulation of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res 69: 46–56, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Pomeranz B, Macaulay RJ, Caudill MA, Kutz I, Adam D, Gordon D, Kilborn KM, Barger AC, Shannon DC, Cohen RJ, , et al. Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 248: H151–H153, 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ramírez J, Duijvenboden SV, Ntalla I, Mifsud B, Warren HR, Tzanis E, Orini M, Tinker A, Lambiase PD, Munroe PB. Thirty loci identified for heart rate response to exercise and recovery implicate autonomic nervous system. Nat Commun 9: 1947, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04148-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Randall WC, Ardell JL, Wurster RD, Milosavljevic M. Vagal postganglionic innervation of the canine sinoatrial node. J Auton Nerv Syst 20: 13–23, 1987. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(87)90077-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rowell LB. Human Cardiovascular Control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sacknoff DM, Gleim GW, Stachenfeld N, Coplan NL. Effect of athletic training on heart rate variability. Am Heart J 127: 1275–1278, 1994. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sampaio KN, Mauad H, Spyer KM, Ford TW. Differential chronotropic and dromotropic responses to focal stimulation of cardiac vagal ganglia in the rat. Exp Physiol 88: 315–327, 2003. doi: 10.1113/eph8802525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Seki A, Green HR, Lee TD, Hong L, Tan J, Vinters HV, Chen PS, Fishbein MC. Sympathetic nerve fibers in human cervical and thoracic vagus nerves. Heart Rhythm 11: 1411–1417, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Shimizu S, Akiyama T, Kawada T, Shishido T, Yamazaki T, Kamiya A, Mizuno M, Sano S, Sugimachi M. In vivo direct monitoring of vagal acetylcholine release to the sinoatrial node. Auton Neurosci 148: 44–49, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Singh S, Johnson PI, Javed A, Gray TS, Lonchyna VA, Wurster RD. Monoamine- and histamine-synthesizing enzymes and neurotransmitters within neurons of adult human cardiac ganglia. Circulation 99: 411–419, 1999. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.99.3.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Strange S, Secher NH, Pawelczyk JA, Karpakka J, Christensen NJ, Mitchell JH, Saltin B. Neural control of cardiovascular responses and of ventilation during dynamic exercise in man. J Physiol 470: 693–704, 1993. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Streuber SD, Amsterdam EA, Stebbins CL. Heart rate recovery in heart failure patients after a 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program. Am J Cardiol 97: 694–698, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Toner A, Jenkins N, Ackland GL; POM-O Study Investigators . Baroreflex impairment and morbidity after major surgery. Br J Anaesth 117: 324–331, 2016. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ulphani JS, Cain JH, Inderyas F, Gordon D, Gikas PV, Shade G, Mayor D, Arora R, Kadish AH, Goldberger JJ. Quantitative analysis of parasympathetic innervation of the porcine heart. Heart Rhythm 7: 1113–1119, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Verlinden TJ, Rijkers K, Hoogland G, Herrler A. Morphology of the human cervical vagus nerve: implications for vagus nerve stimulation treatment. Acta Neurol Scand 133: 173–182, 2016. doi: 10.1111/ane.12462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Verweij N, van de Vegte YJ, van der Harst P. Genetic study links components of the autonomous nervous system to heart-rate profile during exercise. Nat Commun 9: 898, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03395-6. . New results for this article have been published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/194167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wang X, Huang ZG, Gold A, Bouairi E, Evans C, Andresen MC, Mendelowitz D. Propofol modulates gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission to cardiac vagal neurons in the nucleus ambiguus. Anesthesiology 100: 1198–1205, 2004. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200405000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wasserman K. Coupling of external to cellular respiration during exercise: the wisdom of the body revisited. Am J Physiol 266: E519–E539, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.White DW, Raven PB. Autonomic neural control of heart rate during dynamic exercise: revisited. J Physiol 592: 2491–2500, 2014. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.271858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yuan BX, Ardell JL, Hopkins DA, Losier AM, Armour JA. Gross and microscopic anatomy of the canine intrinsic cardiac nervous system. Anat Rec 239: 75–87, 1994. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092390109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES